- F Godlee
The International Cochrane Collaboration is two years old. From small beginnings in September 1992 its membership has grown to over 1000 people. It now has eight collaborating centres around the world and international review groups dealing with 30 clinical areas. Its second international meeting last week in Hamilton, Ontario, attracted over 400 people from 20 countries. But despite these signs of success many who could benefit from the collaboration's work, or contribute to it, remain unaware or unsure of its purpose.
Named after the British epidemiologist Archie Cochrane, the collaboration was set up to evaluate the available evidence from randomised controlled trials. Its underlying assumption is that health care interventions will be more effective if they are based on complete and up to date evidence instead of out of date research, anecdote, and conjecture. Its eventual goals are to create a register of all completed and continuing randomised controlled trials; to combine the results of trials that meet set standards of quality; to produce regularly updated systematic reviews or meta-analyses; and to make these reviews widely available in journals, on CD-ROM, and eventually on line through the internet.
With sophisticated computerised databases such as Medline, finding all randomised …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012