Letters Prehospital thrombolysis Views of non-users ignored BMJ 1994; 309 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6958.871 (Published 01 October 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:871 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles General Practice Attitudes of general practitioners to prehospital thrombolysis Published: 06 August 1994; BMJ 309 doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6951.379 See more Tackling poverty should have equal priority with lowering waiting lists, says King’s Fund BMJ March 18, 2024, 384 q674; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q674 David Oliver: Senior medical leaders have mishandled doctors’ concerns over physician and anaesthesia associates BMJ March 15, 2024, 384 q665; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q665 Only 8% of GP registrars plan to work full time, finds survey BMJ March 15, 2024, 384 q672; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q672 Doctors are told to ration salbutamol amid shortage BMJ March 15, 2024, 384 q673; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q673 Group GP appointments don’t improve outcomes, study reports BMJ March 15, 2024, 384 q667; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q667 Cited by... Emergency care in general practiceFulltext