- M White,
- T Ostbye
EDITOR, — Ronald LaPorte and colleagues presented an impressive, though not unrealistic vision of an electronic future for public health.1 Many of us in public health have used Internet in some of the ways suggested.
In 1990 an electronic network for research and teaching in public health was established among epidemiologists in Hungary, Canada, Norway, Israel, and Australia.2 In 1991, to facilitate a European Community funded TEMPUS (Trans European Mobility Programme for University Studies) project aimed at developing education for a new public health in Hungary, we set up a listserver at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, linking 16 partners in six countries.3 This electronic mailing list has provided a mode of communication between partners, enabling rapid transfer of information and discussion of the project, as well as development of presentations and publications.
More recently, in Newcastle, a listserver has been set up as a part of the Mailbase system open to academics in public health.4 This list facilitates the sharing of information (on workshops, seminars, conferences, research grants, new ideas, etc) and promotes links, collaborative working, joint problem solving, and mutual support. It was initially intended for those working in the United Kingdom, but the membership has grown rapidly over 18 months and has spread to the rest of Europe and North America. At the outset the list was easily accessible only to academics, but the opening up of the information superhighway1 heralds the possibility of a much wider membership for the list, including those working in health services (such as public health physicians in Britain) and others in public sector and non- governmental organisations.
Electronic communication, especially computer conferencing, has also been used as a tool for distance education in epidemiology and biostatistics,5 breaking the isolation that is often felt by …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012