Outcomes research in clinical practice Descriptive studies are unhelpfulBMJ 1994; 309 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6951.412 (Published 06 August 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:412
- M Gregory
- Medical Centre, Rhine Centre, Dusseldorf, BFPO 34
- St Martin's College, Lancaster KA1 3JD
- Castlefields Health Centre, Chester Close, Runcorn WA7 2HY.
EDITOR, - In the issue that included an editorial discussing the importance of outcome research in clinical practice,1 the paper by D J Houghton and colleagues concluded that “general practitioners should no longer request sinus radiography” without measuring any outcomes at all.2
This was a descriptive study in which local general practitioners' knowledge of indications for sinus radiography was assessed. The authors extrapolated the fact that half the population have minor changes on such radiographs and concluded that the indications given were worthless. The requests perceived as due to patient pressure were dismissed on the grounds that general practitioners should invoke the college guidelines. Studies have shown that using the guidelines reduces …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial