Outcomes research in clinical practice Descriptive studies are unhelpful

BMJ 1994; 309 doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6951.412 (Published 6 August 1994)
Cite this as: BMJ 1994;309:412.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. M Gregory
  1. Medical Centre, Rhine Centre, Dusseldorf, BFPO 34
  2. St Martin's College, Lancaster KA1 3JD
  3. Castlefields Health Centre, Chester Close, Runcorn WA7 2HY.

    EDITOR, - In the issue that included an editorial discussing the importance of outcome research in clinical practice,1 the paper by D J Houghton and colleagues concluded that “general practitioners should no longer request sinus radiography” without measuring any outcomes at all.2

    This was a descriptive study in which local general practitioners' knowledge of indications for sinus radiography was assessed. The authors extrapolated the fact that half the population have minor changes on such radiographs and concluded that the indications given were worthless. The requests perceived as due to patient pressure were dismissed on the grounds that general practitioners should invoke the college guidelines. Studies have shown that using the guidelines reduces …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL