- A Saha,
- M Maresh
EDITOR, — We hope that the work of G Flannelly and colleagues will help bring uniformity to the management of different grades of dyskaryosis in cervical smears.1 The management of mildly dyskaryotic smears is not uniform throughout Britain. Kitchener observed in 1991 that 37% of the 210 health districts investigated had a policy of referring patients for colposcopy if a single mildly dyskaryotic smear was obtained.2 The guidelines on cervical screening produced under the auspices of the national coordinating network provide a clear strategy for the management of different grades of dyskaryosis.3
Although the national guidelines on cervical screening were widely distributed among gynaecologists, the extent to which they are followed is unknown. To investigate compliance with the national guidelines among the consultants in gynaecology and obstetrics in the north west of England a postal questionnaire survey was carried out in October 1992 by a regional working party of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' audit unit. The response rate was 100%. Although, according to the national guidelines, referral for colposcopy is advisable only after two consecutive mildly dyskaryotic smears have been obtained, 13 of the 69 consultants surveyed considered a single mildly dyskaryotic smear to be an appropriate criterion for referral. Consultants who performed colposcopy themselves were more likely to consider the procedure for a single mildly dyskaryotic smear than consultants who did not perform colposcopy (11/45 (24%) v 2/24 (8%)).
A uniform strategy of referral for colposcopy for all grades of dyskaryosis would probably be welcomed by doctors working in both primary and secondary care. An easier protocol is more likely to be remembered and adhered to, but two potential problems exist. Firstly, without further allocation of resources the delay between referral and appointment to a colposcopy clinic will worsen. Secondly, with the present …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Emergency admissions for diabetes fall by almost 7% in integrated care pilot scheme
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 24 May 2012
Re: The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties
Published 24 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 24 May 2012
Reply to Anne Szarewski and Diana Mansour
Published 24 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (8 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27