- A P M Heintz
It makes no sense to discuss euthanasia in terms of being for or against it. The basic question is whether we accept the right of human beings to decide for themselves how their lives will end.
The backbone of ethics is respect for human life, and many doctors have interpreted their duty as being to keep patients alive at all costs and for as long as possible. Patients are sometimes treated even when the chances of success are slight, which the recent explosion in medical knowledge has made more likely.1
The request for euthanasia is in many respects a response to this. People now understand that treatment can lengthen not only life but also the suffering that may accompany treatment. They have a choice where once they had none: they can opt for treatment or, if they find …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012