- I Moseley
Magnetic resonance imaging entails a strong static magnetic field and changing magnetic and radiofrequency fields. Problems arise from any metal objects present in the body.
With magnetic resonance imaging, the whole body is in the magnetic field, and sensitive organs cannot be “screened” - as they can in most techniques that use ionising radiation. For example, a foreign object in the head can interfere with the magnetic resonance imaging of any part of the body, down to the toes, and the referring doctor and radiologist must be aware of any potential source of interference even if it is physically distant from (and unrelated to) the problem being investigated. Cleaners, engineers, and anyone accompanying the patient during imaging are subject to the same risks: nobody known to harbour or suspected of harbouring any hazardous object should come near the imager. The National Radiological Protection Board's arbitrary recommendation in 1983 that magnetic resonance imaging should not be …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27