Suprapubic aspiration in children Pyuria is a poor predictor of infection

BMJ 1994; 308 doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6935.1042 (Published 16 April 1994)
Cite this as: BMJ 1994;308:1042.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. R P Bendall,
  2. A P R Wilson
  1. University College London Hospitals, London WC1E 6DB
  2. Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Liverpool L12 2AP
  3. Paediatric Department, St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth PO3 6AD.

    EDITOR, - Heloise Buys and colleagues have shown that suprapubic aspiration of urine in neonates and young children is a safe procedure and yields good quality specimens.1 Their study confirms the value of bacteriuria as a predictor of urinary tract abnormality in this age group. Analysis of their data also supports our view that pyuria is a poor predictor of urinary tract infection. Thus of 545 specimens examined, 439 were sterile and contained no pus cells and 60 were sterile but contained pus cells; of the 46 that were positive on culture, 24 contained pus cells. The sensitivity of pyuria for detecting bacteriuria is 52% (24/46); the specificity is 88% (439/499). Only 24 of 84 pyuric samples were bacteriuric. The positive predictive value of pyuria for bacteriuria in this study is therefore 29% (24/84), indicating that in this population pyuria is a poor predictor of …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL