- A J Lyon,
- N McIntosh,
- R Ilies,
- P W Ross
EDITOR, - Phillip E Hay and colleagues' report on abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and preterm labour.1 The association between infection and preterm labour has been widely reported, with the genital mycoplasmas (Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis) often being implicated.2 Many of the preterm infants need ventilation, and a considerable number develop chronic lung disease. In our unit in 1993 there were 84 survivors of <=30 weeks' gestation, of whom 41 developed chronic lung disease. The aetiology of this disease is multifactorial, with gestation and positive pressure ventilation being the most important determinants.
In a pilot study of the incidence of ureaplasma and mycoplasma infections the endotracheal secretions of all intubated neonates of <=30 weeks' gestation (n=63) were examined weekly from birth while the neonates remained intubated. Sixteen of the infants were positive for one or both organisms, with 11 yielding positive results on the first culture. Fifteen (94%) of these 16 infants with positive cultures went on to develop chronic lung disease whereas only 18 (38%) of the 47 infants for whom culture yielded negative results developed the disease (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in gestation, birth weight, and duration of positive pressure ventilation.
These data agree with data from the United States. 3 It has been suggested not only that these organisms induce preterm labour but that their presence in the lungs causes a low grade inflammatory response, increasing the need for ventilation and hence increasing the degree of damage done by the ventilator, resulting in chronic lung disease. The presence of an inflammatory response in the development of chronic lung disease from the respiratory distress syndrome is well recognised,4and we have found an association between high levels of the cytokine interleukin-8 (as a marker of inflammatory …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012