Compliance in screening programmes High compliance essential in cervical screening programme..BMJ 1994; 308 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6929.652a (Published 05 March 1994) Cite this as: BMJ 1994;308:652
- D Jenkins,
- S Gallivan,
- C Sherlaw-Johnson
- Department of Pathology, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
- NHS Breast Screening Programme, Trent Regional Health Authority, Sheffield S10 3TH
- Cancer Research Education Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE
EDITOR, - D J Torgerson and Cam Donaldson argue that the costs of achieving a high degree of compliance represent a lost opportunity for screening an alternative target population, as might be obtained by reducing the screening interval or screening older patients.1 They conclude that committing resources to increasing compliance may not be the most cost effective method of arriving at an overall reduction in mortality and that screening programmes can be efficient with low levels of compliance. This does not seem to be the case with screening for cervical cancer.
Even in an established programme of screening for cervical cancer a high proportion of cases of invasive cancer arises in unscreened women.2 Several studies have shown that alternative management schedules for women with abnormalities on smear testing alter only slightly the occurrence of invasive cancer among the women being followed up.3,4 Using a stochastic model of the natural course of precancer and its detection by …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial