The Horton General Hospital NHS Trust, Banbury, Oxfordshire OX169AL.
The BMJ aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on improving the health of all people. To achieve these aims we publish original scientific studies, review and educational articles, and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific, social, political, and economic factors affecting health. We are delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories - from doctors and others. We can publish only about 17% of the articles we receive, but we aim to give quick and authoritative decisions. The editorial staff in London are always happy to advise on submissions.
The BMJ is published weekly and has a circulation of about 111 000 - of which roughly 19000 copies are distributed outside Britain. In addition, Bulgarian, Dutch, Hungarian, Indian, Mexican, Pakistani, Portuguese, Spanish, and South African editions reach another 81 000 readers. Material published in the weekly journal may be reproduced in the other editions.
The BMJ's peer review process
Every article received is read by two or more editors. About half of the articles are rejected at this stage, the main reasons for rejection being insufficient originality, serious scientific flaws, and the absence of a message that is important to a general medical audience. We aim to reach a decision on such papers within two weeks of submission.
All papers selected as possible candidates for publication are sent to one or more external referees selected from a database of about 2500 experts. Once we have received the referees' opinions, suitable papers are selected to be discussed by our weekly “hanging committee.” This comprises two of our 12 clinical advisers (all practising clinicians or general practitioners experienced in assessing papers), two editors, and one of our seven statistical advisers. We aim to reach a final decision on …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27