Research Article Eusol. British Medical Journal 1992; 304 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6832.930 (Published 11 April 1992) Cite this as: British Medical Journal 1992;304:930 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter For and against Eusol. Published: 30 May 1992; British Medical Journal 304 doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6839.1442-b Letter For and against Eusol. Published: 30 May 1992; British Medical Journal 304 doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6839.1443 Letter Eusol: the continuing controversy. Published: 20 June 1992; British Medical Journal 304 doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6842.1636-a Letter Eusol: the continuing controversy. Published: 20 June 1992; British Medical Journal 304 doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6842.1636-c See more Andrew Wakefield calls Trump “on our side” over vaccines after meeting BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6545; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6545 Drug firms need to tackle affordability BMJ November 14, 2016, 355 i6096; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6096 US sees rise in rare polio like syndrome of unknown cause BMJ November 07, 2016, 355 i5981; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5981 Authors’ reply to Eisenhut BMJ November 02, 2016, 355 i5787; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5787 A swollen painful foot BMJ November 02, 2016, 355 i5418; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5418