- E. G. Schouten,
- J. M. Dekker,
- J. Pool,
- F. J. Kok,
- M. L. Simoons
Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To investigate the prognostic value of frequently occurring slight variations in the ST segment for cardiovascular mortality in healthy subjects. DESIGN--Follow up study of mortality in relation to variations in ST segment level in a cohort over the 28 years from 1953 to 1981. A case-cohort sampling design was applied to limit the number of electrocardiograms that had to be coded by hand. SETTING--General health examination carried out in 1953 of civil servants in Amsterdam and assessment of subsequent mortality. SUBJECTS--Apparently healthy civil servants aged 40 to 65 years: 1583 men and 1508 women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Relative risk of variations in ST segment level for mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease. RESULTS--In men the multivariate relative risks of 15 year mortality from cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease of slight ST elevation at 80 ms past the J point (compared with isoelectric ST segment) were 0.5 (95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.9) and 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8), respectively. As expected, ST segment depression (greater than 0.25 mm) was associated with increased risk: 1.9 (1.1 to 3.0) and 2.2 (1.2 to 3.9), respectively. In women associations were weaker. The full 28 year period showed a similar pattern of somewhat weaker associations for men; among women, however, no predictive value was apparent. CONCLUSION--These results are empirical evidence for the intuitive opinion among doctors that a curved, upward sloping ST segment, resulting in slight ST elevation at 80 ms, indicates low risk compared with the isoelectric flat, stretched ST segment.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012