- M E Paterson,
- K R Peel,
- C A Joslin
Abstract
The smear histories of 312 women with cancer of the cervix have been determined. Eighty nine women had had at least one negative smear reported in the 10 years before a diagnosis of cancer and 14 had had more than one negative smear. Fifty six of the 89 women had had a negative smear in the three years preceding the diagnosis of cancer. The highest number of negative smears (61) reported was among the 115 women aged under 45. Fifty eight slides reported as negative were submitted to independent review; 13 were subsequently reported as negative, 11 as unsatisfactory, and 34 as abnormal. These findings may in part explain why in this region there has been a disappointing reduction in the incidence of clinically invasive cervix cancer, and our findings may also apply elsewhere. Nevertheless, the confirmed negative smears chiefly occurred within three years of clinical cancer, particularly in the younger women, and this finding suggests that these women may have a short preinvasive phase.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The rise of the pop psychologists
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Health, employment, and economic change, 1973-2009: repeated cross sectional study
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Pfizer Australia faces scrutiny over atorvastatin advertising campaign
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Medicine is our vocation
Published 22 May 2012
Love of Life
Published 22 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (6 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32