- R L Souhami,
- D M Geddes,
- S G Spiro,
- P G Harper,
- J S Tobias,
- B S Mantell,
- F Fearon,
- I Bradbury
Abstract
Three hundred and seventy one patients with extensive or limited small cell cancer of the lung took part in a randomised trial to evaluate irradiation of the primary tumour in patients treated with combination chemotherapy. They were randomly allocated to treatment either with chemotherapy alone (198) or with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (173). All 371 initially received 12 weeks of chemotherapy after which they were categorised according to response. Only those with stable or responding disease continued with their allotted treatment. Thus 144 received chemotherapy alone and 135 received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The design of the study permitted analysis of the effect of radiotherapy according to initial extent of disease and quality of early response to chemotherapy. Radiotherapy (40 Gy (4000 rad), one fraction a day over 20 days) did not improve the survival of patients in any category of initial extent of disease or early response to chemotherapy and was not effective in preventing local relapse.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Health Literacy: Patient involvement and engagement with healthcare
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27