- Charles Murray Boyle
Abstract
Multiple-choice questionaries completed by 234 outpatients were compared with those completed by 35 doctors to evaluate differences between their interpretation of some commonly used medical terms. There were significant differences between the “majority doctors' definition” and the number of patients agreeing with that definition in all cases except the term “a good appetite.” It is suggested that unless the patient is cross-examined recording of symptoms—particularly in computer studies—may be unreliable.
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The rise of the pop psychologists
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Health, employment, and economic change, 1973-2009: repeated cross sectional study
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Pfizer Australia faces scrutiny over atorvastatin advertising campaign
Published 22 May 2012
Re: Medicine is our vocation
Published 22 May 2012
Love of Life
Published 22 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (6 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32