Erratum
Erratum
Cite this as:
BMJ
1898;2:400
This article has a correction
Please see: A Correction
Correction to The Dialectical Society
Correction to British Medical Journal
Correction to Medico-Psychological Association
Correction to Antiseptic Treatment
Correction to Special Correspondence
Correction to Progress of Medical Science
Correction to Cases of Uterine Hæmorrhage
Correction to Observations on the Construction of the Cephalotribe
Correction to Royal College of Physicians
This is a PDF only article
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012