Evaluation of ultra-short dialysis.
Br Med J 1979; 1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.6162.518 (Published 24 February 1979) Cite this as: Br Med J 1979;1:518
- J A Trafford,
- P Sharpstone,
- R Evans,
- R Ireland
Abstract
A study was carried out to compare the effects of three dialysis regimens of different durations. Nineteen patients dialysed over 1975--7 for an average of only 11.2 hours per week were compared with nine dialysed for 24 hours per week (1974--6) and 10 dialysed for 27 hours (1971--3). Clinical, biochemical, and haematological results showed that the short dialysis regimen was as effective as the longer regimens, except that patients had to take a phosphate binder regularly, and that it was considerably cheaper. Short dialysis has social and economic benefits, since patients have more free time and more patients can be treated with the same number of staff and dialysis stations. As in many areas there is a shortage of places for patients needing dialysis, a short regimen is recommended.