Abstract
One hundred patients with symmetrical proliferative diabetic retinopathy had one eye randomly chosen for treatment with xenonarc photocoagulation while the other was left untreated as a control. Patients were subdivided into those with new vessels on both optic discs and those with only peripheral new vessels. In patients with new vessels on the optic discs the vision of the untreated eyes deteriorated more than that of the treated eyes and the difference in deterioration was significant after one, two, and three years. There was no such difference in patients who had only peripheral new vessels. Eighteen patients had become blind in one or both eyes by the last assessment, but only one patient became blind in the treated eye without concomitant blindness in the untreated eye. Thirteen were blind only in the untreated eye. Both photographic and ophthalmoscopic examinations showed that new vessels on the disc regressed more in the treated eyes than in the untreated ones. As some forms of diabetic retinopathy are now treatable, early diagnosis and evaluation is increasingly important.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012