Abstract
One hundred patients with symmetrical proliferative diabetic retinopathy had one eye randomly chosen for treatment with xenonarc photocoagulation while the other was left untreated as a control. Patients were subdivided into those with new vessels on both optic discs and those with only peripheral new vessels. In patients with new vessels on the optic discs the vision of the untreated eyes deteriorated more than that of the treated eyes and the difference in deterioration was significant after one, two, and three years. There was no such difference in patients who had only peripheral new vessels. Eighteen patients had become blind in one or both eyes by the last assessment, but only one patient became blind in the treated eye without concomitant blindness in the untreated eye. Thirteen were blind only in the untreated eye. Both photographic and ophthalmoscopic examinations showed that new vessels on the disc regressed more in the treated eyes than in the untreated ones. As some forms of diabetic retinopathy are now treatable, early diagnosis and evaluation is increasingly important.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The example given is not, statistically and ethically, without faults
Published 28 May 2012
Re: The drug industry is a barrier to diabetes care in poor countries
Published 28 May 2012
Re: Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review
Published 28 May 2012
Re: Anonymised data of all NHS treatments must be put in public domain by 2015, strategy says
Published 28 May 2012
Re: Perfectionism in doctors
Published 28 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27