Alternatives to Animal Experiments in Medical ResearchBr Med J 1974; 1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5907.557 (Published 23 March 1974) Cite this as: Br Med J 1974;1:557
- J. L. Gowans
In laboratory work which involves the large-scale routine assay of biologically-active substances the sponsors of “alternative” (in vitro) methods and the scientists have a common aim: a reduction in the use of living animals. In vitro methods are usually more accurate, easier to perform, and cheaper. Animals are no longer required for the production of certain antiviral vaccines.
Those engaged in medical research where new knowledge is being sought also need no incentive to develop in vitro methods because they make refined analysis possible. Nevertheless, such in vitro methods are usually not alternatives in the sense that they substitute for animals; they complement experiments on animals. A legal requirement “that no experiment on a living animal may be performed if the purpose of the experiment can be achieved by alternative means not involving an experiment on a living animal” would be unenforceable.
↵* Stephen Paget Memorial Lecture to Research Defence Society, 16 October 1973.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial