Snatching defeat from the jaws of Pyrrhic victory
BMJ 2016; 353 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3053 (Published 06 June 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;353:i3053- Andy Cowper, editor
- Health Policy Insight
- andycowper{at}hotmail.com
The classicists among BMJ readers will already know that a Pyrrhic victory costs the winner so highly that it is all but a defeat. This is a lesson that both the BMA junior doctors’ committee (JDC) leadership and the health secretary for England, Jeremy Hunt, have learnt the hard way.
After all the rhetoric—#timetotalkJeremy (JDC) and (Hunt’s) “the matter is closed”1—further negotiation was, in the end, possible.2
Indeed, after a few days’ talks, they did the deal3 that the JDC now recommends—and it’s not massively different4 from the previous “to be imposed” deal.5
Most importantly for the government and NHS leaders fighting to keep finances upright, the agreement they reached remained “cost neutral.”
Collateral damage
The collateral damage to both …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.