Rapid Responses to:

RESEARCH:
Alastair D Hay, Céire Costelloe, Niamh M Redmond, Alan A Montgomery, Margaret Fletcher, Sandra Hollinghurst, and Tim J Peters
Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial
BMJ 2008; 337: a1302 [Abstract] [Full text]
*Rapid Responses: Submit a response to this article

Rapid Responses published:

[Read Rapid Response] Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen
Edward Purssell, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA   (3 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Re: Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen
Umesh Prabhu   (4 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] conclusion?
yogi sehgal   (5 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] A validation of Street Wisdom
Andrew P Mimnagh   (6 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children
Jaseem Siddiqui   (6 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] absences in IBU+Para in children
Nicholas D Moore   (10 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Increased risk of soft tissue infections in children who take ibuprofen and ibuprofen and paracetamol
Carlos A Calderon Ospina, Alejandra Salcedo   (11 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] PITCH: an indication of the level of emotion in relation to childhood fevers.
Wouter Havinga   (11 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Paracetamol and Ibuprofen (or Dipyrone) 3 hours each
Leonardo C M Savassi, Betim, Minas Gerais, Brazil   (12 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Be cautious to avoid over treatment!
Sen Devadathan   (18 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] No numbers in the abstract
Trish Groves   (23 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] Other dangers of NSAIDs
Marise A McQueen   (24 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] PITCH conclusions need to be retracted by the BMJ
Wouter Havinga   (29 September 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] some missed points
Gema Ponce Revilla   (11 October 2008)
[Read Rapid Response] A missed opportunity.
Sharon Conroy   (16 October 2008)

Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen 3 September 2008
 Next Rapid Response Top
Edward Purssell,
Lecturer
King's College London,
57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA

Send response to journal:
Re: Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen

Fever is a common in childhood, and is one of a number of related signs and symptoms associated with conditions such as infection. Although some infections are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, fever of itself is rarely dangerous. Whilst fever is no doubt unpleasant, it is not clear how much of the distress of the febrile child is due to the fever compared to other symptoms such as pain and reflected parental anxiety.

A recent study in the BMJ sought to compare paracetamol and ibuprofen combinations with the two drugs alone1. The authors correctly note that the need to treat fever with antipyretics is not necessarily evidenced based, yet go on to test a potentially hazardous treatment that for that very purpose, when safe, perfectly acceptable treatments in the form of ibuprofen and paracetamol monotherapy are available.

Although combining these drugs may seem benign, encouraging polypharmacy may lead to confusion and misdosing, and the over aggressive persuit of normothermia that many clinicians have worked hard to reduce. Even in the rarefied environment of this study, a significant number of parents were not able to dose their children correctly. It is also not clear that combining these drugs is safe2 3, something that could not be established in a study of this small size.

Fever phobia among parents has been much discussed in the literature4, and it has been suggested that this extends to professionals5. This paper demonstrates that this is the case, and may, unfortunately be used by those who don’t really understand the risks and benefits of such an approach to support a treatment that is not needed, for a symptom that does not actually need treating, by people whom it is clear that even from these data, have a relatively high chance of getting the treatment wrong. With these reservations in mind, clinicians should continue to follow the recommendations contained within the NICE guidelines that parents should be advised to use one drug alone6.

The author was a member of the NICE Feverish illness in children guideline development group

1. Hay AD, Costelloe C, Redmond NM, Montgomery AA, Fletcher M, Hollinghurst S, et al. Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2008;337:a1409. 2. Del Vecchio MT, Sundel ER. Alternating antipyretics: is this an alternative? Pediatrics 2001;108:1236-1237. 3. Mayoral CE, Mariono RVM, Rosenfeld W, Greensher J. Alternating antipyretics: is this an alternative? Pediatrics 2000;105(5):1009-1012. 4. Crocetti M, Moghbeli N, Serwint J. Fever phobia revisited: have parental misconceptions about fever changed in 20 years? Pediatrics 2001;107:1241-1246. 5. May A, Bauchner H. Fever phobia: the paediatrician's contribution. Pediatrics 1992;90(6):851-854. 6. NICE. Feverish illness in children - Assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years. London: National Institute for Health and Clincial Excellence, 2007.

Competing interests: Member of feverish illness in children NICE GDG

Re: Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen 4 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Umesh Prabhu,
Consultant Paediatrician
The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Combining paracetamol and ibuprofen

Fever itself doesn't do any harm except producing febrile convulsion in a small percentage (5%) of children with fever. But fever can make a child uncomfortable, unwell and irritable. Hence it is important to try to bring down the fever at least to make the child comfortable. But I do agree that we should avoid polypharmacy and use either paracetamol or ibuprofen. Rarely we need to use combined therapy. My personal experience suggests that some children respond better to paracetmol and others to ibuprofen. This is just a personal observation and very unscientific and not an evidence based. I am yet to convince that giving antipyretics masks underlying meningitis or septicaemia. However, the fundamental reason for missing the diagnosis in children with serious conditions like meningitis or septicaemia is because doctors miss some important clues in the history or examination findings.

These are some of the important symptoms or signs which have been missed by some doctors.

1. History of drowsiness is not taken seriously.
2. History of 'poor feeding' not elicited or not taken seriously.
3. Forgetting that Meningococcal rash can be maculo-papular in early stages and in some children.
4. Forgetting that septicaemia can be present without any rash.
6. Not recording vital signs or when the vital signs are abnormal ignoring it because GCS is 15.
7. Failing to record Capillary Refil Time (CRT) in children.
8. Failing to feel Anterior Fontanel in an infant with fever.
9. Failing to warn parents as to when to seek help if the child deteriorates or what symptoms to watch out.
10. Inexperienced junior doctors allowed to discharge children without being seen by someone with Paediatric experience.

Hopefully the NICE guidance should help the profession to make sure that children are diagnosed and treated early.

Competing interests: None declared

conclusion? 5 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
yogi sehgal,
rural family physician, clinical professor, Northern Ontario School of Medicine
Sioux Lookout, p8t 1a8

Send response to journal:
Re: conclusion?

Given the minimal clinical difference between acetaminophen (paracetamol) and ibuprofen, I would conclude the opposite to the authors of the paper.

Acetaminophen has been around for a long time, is very inexpensive and very safe, so why would one not use it first for analgesia (not for pyrexia as there is no evidence for antipyretics preventing febrile seizures) when there are theoretical risks of ibuprofen and case reports of major (although limited and rare) renal and GI effects? Polypharmacy is perfectly reasonable as well- -we do it all the time in adults with more or less useless combinations of acetaminophen and narcotics (such as tylenol #3). There is no reason not use acetaminophen and ibuprofen together when one or the other is ineffective.

This combination, in my experience, is certainly more effective than acetaminophen and codeine, which is extremely popular and overused (and abused) in North America. Every paper I've seen on analgesia in the ER suggests we are undertreating and underdosing children, so let's at least treat them with the safe drugs at good doses (acetaminophen at least 15mg/kg and ibuprofen 10mg/kg) and not discourage their use.

Competing interests: None declared

A validation of Street Wisdom 6 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Andrew P Mimnagh,
Pricipal in General Practice
Eastview Surgery L22 4QD

Send response to journal:
Re: A validation of Street Wisdom

It is gratifying to see a methodologically sound analysis of a "trend from the streets".Working "Out of Hours" I have seen over a decade of parents who have already firmly reached this conclusion. I welcome the opportunity to "validate" their conclusion. It does raise the issue are the other "street" conclusions without published evidence sound or not - I hope to see something on the rising "Even if its only a virus they still get better quicker with antibiotics Doc."that feels wrong to me, and ideally before widespread OTC antibiotic use emerges.

Competing interests: None declared

Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children 6 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Jaseem Siddiqui,
General Practitioner
Custom House Square Medical Centre Lower Mayor Street Dublin 1

Send response to journal:
Re: Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children

In my personnel experience I have found this combination far superior

Competing interests: None declared

absences in IBU+Para in children 10 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Nicholas D Moore,
Director of Clinical Research/clinical pharmacology
Bordeaux University Hospital, 33076

Send response to journal:
Re: absences in IBU+Para in children

Congratulations on a very interesting paper, that shows that adding paracetamol to ibuprofen may have some benefit, but only after the first four hours, when the mean temperature is already under 37. Within the first four hours, which is probably what parents look for, ibuprofen acts better and faster than paracetamol, as has already been demonstrated many times for fever in children and for pain in adults. In this period, ibu+para is marginally better than ibu alone. Maybe the best might be to use ibu+para for the first dose, then continue on ibu alone (or para alone) - this might be another interesting study, possibly avoiding the complex dosing schedule shown here.

Two points that surprised me, however: - Nowhere in the abstract is the number of patients included in the study mentioned. Considering the importance of sample size in study evaluation, this is very surprising. Or I missed it, but I read the abstract through word by word 3 times (at least). In the text, there is a long paragraph on recruitment difficulties, but it is nowhere written: "in the end 156 patients were included or randomized or analyzed, 52 in each group", though of course this information can be found in tables or figures. - The authors cite an ancillary result of sam Lesko's study, concerning excess asthma in children on paracetamol, but not the main study paper, which might have been appropriate, since this study in 84000 patients established the equivalent safety of ibuprofen and paracetamol used to treat fever in children. (Lesko SM, Mitchell AA. An assessment of the safety of pediatric ibuprofen. A practitioner-based randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1995 Mar 22-29;273(12):929-33.)

Otherwise a very nice paper

Competing interests: None declared

Increased risk of soft tissue infections in children who take ibuprofen and ibuprofen and paracetamol 11 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Carlos A Calderon Ospina,
Assistant Professor
Pharmacology Unit. Faculty of Medicine. Universidad del Rosario. Bogota. Colombia.,
Alejandra Salcedo

Send response to journal:
Re: Increased risk of soft tissue infections in children who take ibuprofen and ibuprofen and paracetamol

Recently, the BMJ published a clinical study according to which the combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol is more effective in going temperature down in children with fever (1). In turn, ibuprofen is more effective as monotherapy than paracetanol in controlling this symptom; that is why the authors conclude that for discomfort feverish children; first it should be administrate ibuprofen and then consider adding paracetamol for 24 hours in case of do not obtain the expected recovery.

However, there are a few reports that suggest an association between the intake of ibuprofen or ibuprofen and paracetamol and an increased risk to suffer from soft-tissue infections, some of them very serious such as necrotizing fasciitis (2,3,4,5,6). Some of these studies shown an increase of the risk arose from the intake of ibuprofen as monotherapy (2,3,5,6), or the combination between ibuprofen and paracetamol (3,4); but at the same time a few of them are very emphatic showing that there is not an increase in the risk associated to the intake of paracetamol alone (3,4,7).

The main risk factors for suffering from necrotizing fasciitis associated to nonsteroideal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) include age (children) and a viral disease during the treatment. In fact, a French, case (patients with soft tissue necrotizante infection)-control study, published recently (6), documented that among 38 cases that were reported to the National System of Pharmacovigilance between 2000 and 2004, 25 patients were exposed to ibuprofen and 24 patients had have chickenpox. In the same study patients had a median age of 4 years old, and the adjusted odds ratios for exposure to NSAIDs and for viral infection were 31,38 (IC 95% 6,40 – 153,84) and 17,55 (IC 95% 3,47 – 88,65) respectively.

It is quite interesting that in Hay´s et. al. study (1), 57 children with viral diseases were included (36,5%), and although it says that five children were hospitalized due to adverse serious events, it is not clear how these events happened or none extra information besides the medication taken is given.

To conclude, I think that is not possible to ignore the available evidence, and although the combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol could be more effective for treating fever in children, precautions have to be taken when administrating this combination in children with viral infections, especially in children with chickenpox, and in this population the administration of paracetamol should be considered as monotherapy, decreasing the risk of suffering from soft tissue infections such as necrotizing fasciitis.

References

1. Hay A, Costelloe C, Redmond N, Montgomery A, Fletcher M, Hollinghurst S, Peters T. Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1302.

2. Zerr DM, Alexander ER, Duchin JS, Koutsky LA, Rubens CE. A case- control study of necrotizing fasciitis during primary varicella. Pediatrics. 1999; 103: 783 - 790.

3. Lesko SM, O'Brien KL, Schwartz B, Vezina R, Mitchell AA. Invasive group A streptococcal infection and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use among children with primary varicella. Pediatrics. 2001; 107:1108 -1115.

4. Lesko SM. The safety of ibuprofen suspension in children. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2003; 135: 50 - 53.

5. Leroy S, Mosca A, Landre-Peigne C, Cosson MA, Pons G. Ibuprofen in childhood: evidence-based review of efficacy and safety. Arch Pediatr. 2007; 14: 477 - 484.

6. Souyri C, Olivier P, Grolleau S, Lapeyre-Mestre M; French Network of Pharmacovigilance Centres. Severe necrotizing soft-tissue infections and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008; 33: 249 -255.

7. Mikaeloff Y, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of severe skin and soft tissue complications in patients with varicella or zoster disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 65: 203 - 209.

Competing interests: None declared

PITCH: an indication of the level of emotion in relation to childhood fevers. 11 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Wouter Havinga,
GP locum
GL6 6JL

Send response to journal:
Re: PITCH: an indication of the level of emotion in relation to childhood fevers.

 

Hay and colleagues state that ibuprofen and paracetamol can reduce temperature but these analgesics were not compared with placebo. Therefore it is also not clear if they provide additional statistical significant improvement in fever associated discomfort, or in activity levels in treated children as compared to placebo. 1  

The NICE guideline and development group already confirmed that thermometer results do not need treatment according to the medical literature from the past few decades. Fever does not need treatment but NICE advised to treat the perceived symptoms. 2 However, this advice to treat discomfort with analgesics is still not verified with this study.  

Hay and colleagues have based their conclusion on speculation. This is outlined in their discussion under the heading "Implications of this research". The conclusion is not based on scientific results as the study did not include placebo but, as pointed out in the first sentence of the conclusion, on emotive factors: Doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and parents want to use medicines to treat young, unwell children with fever.  

The BMJ will make serious editorial mistakes if it decides to print the advice in the conclusion of this article - to consider treating fever with ibuprofen and to consider adding paracetamol -  because it is based on speculation and furthermore, to have that conclusion promoted in the third sentence in the box which highlights "What this study adds". 

Thereby the BMJ adds weight to the hypnotic mantra "treat the fever" and perpetuates fever phobia at the expense of children.  The publication of that conclusion on the BMJ website has already had this seeding impact through reports in the press. (3) 

The conclusion that follows from this study, could instead point to the need for  a national campaign to inform parents, in such a way that they will be more confident to support the fever process in their child. This also calls for extensive research into the natural physiological patterns and benefits of childhood fevers. (4) 

Therefore, Hay and colleagues have conducted an important study that can contribute in opening up several lines of research, by people who are willing to think outside of the box.  

 

  1. Alastair D Hay, Céire Costelloe, Niamh M Redmond, Alan A Montgomery, Margaret Fletcher, Sandra Hollinghurst, and Tim J Peters. Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial. BMJ, Sep 2008; 337: a1302.
  2. Feverish illness in children http://www.nice.org.uk/CG47
  3. http://www.nhs.uk/news/2008/09September/Pages/Combiningpainkillersforchildren.aspx
  4. Havinga W. Time to counter 'fever phobia'! Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):253. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=14694712

 

 

Competing interests: None declared

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen (or Dipyrone) 3 hours each 12 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Leonardo C M Savassi,
Coordinator
Medical Residence at Family Medicine,
Betim, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Send response to journal:
Re: Paracetamol and Ibuprofen (or Dipyrone) 3 hours each

Family Physicians and Pediatricians in Brazil normally prescribe Paracetamol plus Dipyrone (that has proved its safety here)or Ibuprofen only when fever comes up before 6 hours since last dose of one of them.

But they're not used at the same time. We normally use only one, 3 hours each, IF fever comes up before the intervall between the doses of a single one.

Fever is a normal reaction of the body and the main problem about it is febrile seizure, that has been proved not to harm (febrile seizure is a normal reaction of the body and does not impair cognition, neurological development or any other neurological condition).

So, I agree with the colleagues when they use paracetamol as the first choice and associate other drugs only in cases they are needed.

1. Febrile Seizures: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Long-term Management of the Child With Simple Febrile Seizures. Pediatrics 2008;121;1281-1286. http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/121/6/1281

2. Anthony Harnden. Editorial: Antipyretic treatment for feverish young children in primary care. BMJ 2008; 337:a1409. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/337

3. Martin Richardson, Monica Lakhanpaul and on behalf of the Guideline. Assessment and initial management of feverish illness in children younger than 5 years:summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2007;334;1163- 1164. http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/334/7604/1163

4. Brazilian Cochrane Centre. Dipyrone for acute primary headaches. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD004842

Competing interests: None declared

Be cautious to avoid over treatment! 18 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Sen Devadathan,
Consultant Cardiologist (locum)
Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton

Send response to journal:
Re: Be cautious to avoid over treatment!

Congratulations to the authors for the interesting paper. Pyrexia is a sign of healthy body's response to insult. The conventional medical wisdom is to look for the cause of pyrexia, rather than suppressing it. I agree, it is different in young children, as the febrile child becomes irritable and difficult to manage at home. Both acetaminophen and ibuprofen are effective antipyretic agents. I am sure properly administered combination is safe and more effective (as demonstrated in this study) than a single agent. But we shouldn't ignore the efficacy of sensible physical measures, in our enthusiasm for advocating pharmacologic treatments. I would use caution and restrict the combination therapy to cases where single agents have failed in controlling symptoms. We need more evidence before recommending ibuprofen- paracetamol combination to public.

Competing interests: None declared

No numbers in the abstract 23 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Trish Groves,
Deputy editor
BMJ

Send response to journal:
Re: No numbers in the abstract

Nicholas Moore is right, and this paper's abstract should have stated the number of participants. Our advice at http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors/types-of-article/research asks authors of RCTs - such as this one - to provide a CONSORT-style abstract with a "results" subheading that states the number of participants randomised to each group.

For other types of study our advice asks for this subsection:

participants (instead of patients or subjects) - numbers entering and completing the study, sex, and ethnic group if appropriate. Give clear definitions of how selected, entry and exclusion criteria

We're sorry we didn't get the abstract right this time, and we're grateful for this important reminder.

Competing interests: I'm the BMJ's senior research editor and I maintain our advice to authors

Other dangers of NSAIDs 24 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Marise A McQueen,
Staff grade, Anaphylaxis Service,
Glasgow G11 6NT

Send response to journal:
Re: Other dangers of NSAIDs

In adults, NSAIDs and Aspirin can cause 'allergic' side effects due to intollerance of COX 1 inhibition and subsequent release of leukotreines with resultant urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis, wheeze. This intollerance may become more common in children if the NSAID Ibuprofen is used frequently over the childhood years - and presumably this is more likely to occur in 'fever phobic' parents. Admittedly, Ibuprofen is a relatively weak nsaid, but it can still cause anaphylaxis in adults. Paracetamol can also cause these COX 1 inhibitor intollerant reactions but only in highly sensitised patients since it is a very weak inhibitor of COX.

I think promoting ibuprofen use in children may lead to trouble with intollerance in the long term.

In addition, there is the question of Reye's syndrome which we feel may be precipitated by using Aspirin in childhood. Am I the only person who thinks Ibuprofen may have more of an Aspirin like effect, even though the molecules of aspirin and paracetamol look more alike? Could it not be that in future studies of the use of Ibuprofen in febrile children that we end up seeing more asthma developing?

Marise McQueen

Competing interests: None declared

PITCH conclusions need to be retracted by the BMJ 29 September 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Wouter Havinga,
GP locum
GL6 6JL

Send response to journal:
Re: PITCH conclusions need to be retracted by the BMJ

In the rapid responses in relation to PITCH, I read words like 'surprised', 'misleading title', 'just an opinion' from Nicholas Moore, Director of Clinical Research/clinical pharmacology and the word 'astonished' from Anthony Harnden, University Lecturer in General Practice. (1,2)

However, they did not use these words in relation to the PITCH study. On the topic of pharmacovigilance, Beasley's research article in the Lancet is not the first to bring up an association between paracetamol use and chronic non-communicable diseases. (3) Pharmacovigilance should be included in Dr Anthony Harnden's editorial message as pharmacovigilance is in the interest of the public. (4)

After the NICE guidance, it's actually astonishing to see a conclusion suggesting that "Parents, nurses, pharmacists, and doctors should use (anti-inflammatory) medicines to supplement physical measures to maximise the time children spend without fever."

I read from a deputy editor that the BMJ looks out for 'error, weakness, or incompleteness in the original article. The senior research editor writes that the BMJ maintains the advice to the authors and "want it to be as scientifically accurate as possible." (5, 6)

Fickleness is the word that comes to mind: fickleness from academics that do not apply their appraisal skills to the PITCH studies but divert to other areas, conveniently overlooking the fact that PITCH didn't use a placebo and as such can not conclude with advice on using anti-inflammatory drugs in feverish children. (7)

Let alone the advice on maximising time without fever… Hopefully people will now realise that fever phobia is iatrogenic.

If academics want to contribute to the health of society and would follow their scientific line of thought properly they ought to reassess PITCH for the sake of children and not pitch for their own sake.

Furthermore the misleading and fever phobia seeding title on the front page of the BMJ "Which drug for feverish children?" and the picture on the index page of a sleeping child with a flannel on the forehead with the title "Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children.", need to be retracted as the message is not evidence based but is causing documented harm. Due to the high impact factor, publications in the BMJ carry a massive responsibility, in this case for the children in the world.

Due to "error, weakness and incompleteness" in the original article, appropriate action should be taken by those involved and the BMJ should retract the printed conclusions of the PITCH studies.

  1. Nicholas D Moore. Ibuprofen is a marker of soft tissue infection more than its cause. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep23_2/a1767#202402
  2. Anthony Harnden. Ibuprofen and soft tissue infections. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep23_2/a1767#202444
  3. Kanabar D, Dale S, Rawat M. A review of ibuprofen and acetaminophen use in febrile children and the occurrence of asthma-related symptoms. Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2716-23 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18201589
  4. Wouter Havinga. In the interest of the public.
    http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep02_2/a1409#202312
  5. Tony Delamothe, deputy editor, BMJ. Setting limits to infinite error http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/337/sep25_1/a1823
  6. Trish Groves, Deputy editor BMJ. No numbers in the abstract. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep02_2/a1302#202361
  7. Wouter Havinga. PITCH: an indication of the level of emotion in relation to childhood fevers. http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep02_2/a1302#201799

Competing interests: see http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/337/sep02_2/a1409#202312

some missed points 11 October 2008
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Gema Ponce Revilla,
Internship Family Medicine
centro saúde benfica, USF Rodrigues Migueis

Send response to journal:
Re: some missed points

The authors don´t mention the range of temperatures they were treating (we don´t know the initial media temperature in each group). I think it would be adequate to mention that.

In addition, they don´t mention wich were the suspected causes of fever. I consider this also important... as sometimes suspected initial viral diseases modifies and complicates with bacterian diseases and also it´s not the same treating rubella (mild fever) than flu (usually higher)for example.

In my opinion the disconfort relief can be associated also to the analgesic power of both ibuprofen and paracetamol, so i think this article opens a way to investigate if the relief is associated to analgesic, or antipiretic power or both.

By the way i find the article really interesting, and the discussion rich, as i can see there are lots of ways of managing fever problems that also modifies with the country we work in!

Competing interests: None declared

A missed opportunity. 16 October 2008
Previous Rapid Response  Top
Sharon Conroy,
Lecturer in Paediatric Clinical Pharmacy
School of Graduate Medicine and Health, University of Nottingham,

Send response to journal:
Re: A missed opportunity.

This study by Hay et al used the maximum recommended dose of ibuprofen and a 'standard' dose of paracetamol and so was not comparing like with like - a missed opportunity funded by the HTA. Ibuprofen has already been shown by a number of other studies (some cited in Hay's paper) to be superior to paracetamol in terms of temperature reduction and duration of action, however all of these studies were either of poor methodological quality and/or used small doses of paracetamol vs maximum doses of ibuprofen. The question of 'superiority' of the two drugs therefore still unfortunately remains unanswered.

I totally agree with Purssel's response and that educating healthcare professionals and parents that having a temperature is not a dangerous thing in itself and is actually part of the body’s defence system to fight infection. There is no need to treat it unless the child is very uncomfortable or distressed by it, and if so we should treat these symptoms NOT a thermometer reading. Evidence available shows that the use of anti-pyretics does not prevent febrile convulsions.

Hay's study also showed that 6-13% of parents made errors in drug administration & exceeded the maximum recommended daily dose of one or both drugs when asked to give the two preparations even under these clinical trial conditions. Surely this supports NOT recommending combining the two drugs by parents at home given the lack of firm evidence that combination is superior in terms of valid outcomes i.e. patient distress/discomfort.

Sharon Conroy

Competing interests: I was a member of the NICE guideline development group for the management of feverish illness in children.