Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
Patrick Mitchell, Consultant Neurosurgeon Newcastle General Hospital NE4 6BE
Send response to journal:
|
Re BMJ 2008;337:a2554, 2747 & 1864 These articles on patient preference trials detail a significant step in the conduct of randomised trials in surgery. Over the past four years we have been developing a randomised trial methodology that shares many of the advantages of patient preference trials: the Null Seeking Trial. In this scheme the spectrum of indication for an operation ranging from clear indication through equipoise to clear contraindication is enumerated as an index of indication. The index for specific patients presenting with the condition of interest is calculated and they are asked to participate. If they agree, they and their clinicians view the result of patients who have previously participated in the Null Seeking Trial plotted against those patients' indices of indication. After consulting the data patients and clinicians are asked to decide whether to have one treatment, the alternative, or to be randomised. They then undergo the treatment they have selected or been randomised to and when their outcome is known it is added immediately to the results of the trial and placed in the public domain. This scheme allows a negative feedback loop to operate where the position of equipoise in the spectrum of indication is guided by previous results of the trial. This negative feedback loop causes the zone of equipoise to converge on the true point of no difference between the treatments being studied. A preliminary report was published in 2006. A full account is pending. 1) Mitchell, P; Gregson, B. A.; Mendelow, A. D.; Null Seeking Trials; Proceedings of the Scottish and Newcastle Neurosurgery Research Group: GNAMED Meeting May 2006 Pages 8-15; Newcastle University; ISBN: 0701702109 Competing interests: None declared |
|||