If a "sliding scale" on the burden of proof and "a higher, criminal
standard of proof will be retained for cases where there's a threat of
erasure from the register" and if criminal standard of proof is equivalent
to 'beyond reasonable doubt' which seems to be implied in Hamish Meldrum's
demand, then I am not quite sure what the objections are based on.
Is this another example of how democracy works. What the government
proposes the opposition must oppose and what therefore the management says
the trade unions must oppose.
Competing interests:
No related interests