Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
Nigel Higson, General Practitioner Goodwood Court Medical Centre 52 Cromwell Road Hove BN3 3ER
Send response to journal:
|
For a professional journal representing the professional (in this case the General Practitioner) I am amazed to read this editorial based on a DoH press release. Manipulating statistics is a skill of this government and maximising spin is only helped by such editorials. Those of us at "ground zero" of general practice are not enamoured by practice based commissioning and there is a considerable discrepancy between those who "signed up" to the enhanced payment scheme to explore practice based commissioning and those who actively wish to take part. As with everything this government does, throwing money at a problem seems to produce results on paper but not in reality. Certainly in our area the majority of practices who have received payments under level 2 of the enhanced scheme (of which I am not one) have contributed little to debates, have shown little enthusiasm for change, and - in any case- are hampered by grossly inaccurate information obtained from the secondary care sector. No savings have been made and overall there has been a considerable expenditure incurred by the PCT . The BMJ would be better researching attitudes to Practice based commissioning and base its published articles on such research. Competing interests: None declared |
|||