Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
Neil Pakenham-Walsh, Coordinator, HIFA2015 Campaign 16 Woodfield Drive, Charlbury OX7 3SE
Send response to journal:
|
Jonathan Lomas omits to highlight a critical aspect of research communication: systematic review. By doing so, his analysis risks perpetuating the common and dangerous misconception that successful research communication is equivalent to translating the conclusions of a research study into practice. As Iain Chalmers and others have argued for many years, successful research communication must, wherever possible, be based on the scientific cumulation of research knowledge, not the individual study. Communicators or 'knowledge brokers' who ignore this are likely to end up misleading, advertently or inadvertently, the decision makers they are seeking to inform. Readers with an interest in research communication and healthcare in developing countries are invited to join the global HIFA2015 email discussion group (Healthcare Information For All by 2015): to join, send your name, organisation and brief description of your professional interests to hifa2015-admin@dgroups.org Neil Pakenham-Walsh MB,BS
"Healthcare Information For All by 2015: By 2015, every person worldwide will have access to an informed healthcare provider" Competing interests: None declared |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ben Toth, Chief Executive Health Perspectives
Send response to journal:
|
Jonathan Lomas is right to identify the need for knowledge brokering, and much the same point was made in the recent Cooksey review of UK health research. The NHS already has a network of knowledge brokers, for which it pays well over £50m a year. The network consists of around 1000 library staff and 500 access points, but is not sufficiently 'tuned' to provide knowledge brokering. This is unfortunate, since the application of knowledge to support quality of care should be the chief priority of NHS expenditure on library and information services. Competing interests: None declared |
|||