Rapid Responses to:

NEWS:
Jeanne Lenzer
Doctors refuse space to group fighting drug company influence
BMJ 2005; 331: 653-a [Full text]
*Rapid Responses: Submit a response to this article

Rapid Responses published:

[Read Rapid Response] Ridiculous decision, thankfully now reversed
Peter J Flegg   (23 September 2005)
[Read Rapid Response] Strange but true
John P Heptonstall   (24 September 2005)
[Read Rapid Response] Re: Strange but true
Nora W. Coffey, Rick Schweikert   (25 September 2005)

Ridiculous decision, thankfully now reversed 23 September 2005
 Next Rapid Response Top
Peter J Flegg,
Physician
Blackpool, FY3 8NR

Send response to journal:
Re: Ridiculous decision, thankfully now reversed

The American Academy of Family Physicians took a similar line on this issue as did the American College of Physicians at its annual meeting in April. Fortunately the Academy has had a change of heart and has now agreed to host the No Free Lunch exhibit(1), (albeit next to an exhibit promoting the qualities of Californian wine).

It is saddening that the Academy seems to have been blind to all logic and reason in the first place, and only arrived at this decision following an outcry from its members and other health professionals.

1. http://www.aafp.org/x38241.xml

Competing interests: None declared

Strange but true 24 September 2005
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
John P Heptonstall,
Director of the Morley Acupuncture Clinic
Leeds LS27 8EG

Send response to journal:
Re: Strange but true

Perhaps someone could explain what is so strange about the noted doctors 'Academy' preferring the company of large fee paying purveyors of pharmaceuticals and fast food to that of such fellow professionals?

Regards

John H.

Competing interests: None declared

Re: Strange but true 25 September 2005
Previous Rapid Response  Top
Nora W. Coffey,
President, Hysterectomy Educational Resources & Services (HERS) Foundation
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004,
Rick Schweikert

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Strange but true

Indeed, John, sad but true. "First do no harm" is often replaced by "First how much do I stand to gain". We are heartened by the response of Peter J. Flegg and yourself. Surely he is not the only physician who feels this way.

The outcry from members of the Academy was powerful enough to reverse their initial preposterous decision. We hope more physicians join him with public response in support of ethics that improve medicine for patients and physicians alike.

Competing interests: None declared