Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
A.A.W. Amarasinghe,M.D.,, ConsultantPsychiatrist 102, Bayberry Hill, McDonough, Georgia 30253 USA
Send response to journal:
|
" Revalidation " is an eventual inevitability. How many more incompetencies, scandals, cover-ups etc. are to be endured before the foot dragging terminates? Competing interests: None declared |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Jay Ilangaratne, Founder medical-journals.com
Send response to journal:
|
I think it would be a good idea for doctors in general,and GPs in particular,to apprise themselves of legal dilemmas they may have to face in the diagnosis/treatment of meningitis. The followiing recent judgments[1],[2] of the High Court illustrate the difficulties that doctors may encounter in the diagnosis of meningitis in community and hospital settings.Further,the same judgments also provide useful commentaries of the legal tests applied in such circumstances in relation to claims of negligence.Perhaps, doctors should be regularly kept informed of such medicolegal issues, as such information is likely to have wider beneficial effects on patients, doctors themselves and their liability insurers. References [1]Brown v Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority & Others [2005] EWHC 1098(QB) (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/1098.html) [2]McDonnell V Dr Holwerda [2005] EWHC 108(QB) (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2005/1081.html) JS@medical-journals.com Competing interests: None declared |
|||