Rapid Responses to:

NEWS:
Fiona Fleck
Bush accused of pressuring countries to stop producing generic drugs
BMJ 2004; 329: 192 [Full text]
*Rapid Responses: Submit a response to this article

Rapid Responses published:

[Read Rapid Response] Generic Hypocrisy
Steve B Norris   (25 July 2004)
[Read Rapid Response] Re: Generic Hypocrisy
Katherine Hovey   (27 July 2004)
[Read Rapid Response] HIV-It could bite back !
Sanjay D Furtado, Jairaj Furtado   (27 July 2004)

Generic Hypocrisy 25 July 2004
 Next Rapid Response Top
Steve B Norris,
Facilities Manager
Hampshire PO6

Send response to journal:
Re: Generic Hypocrisy

When the US took South Africa to court to stop their government buying cheaper generic aids drugs from Asia instead of the more expensive American supplied drugs they fortunatly lost.

Isn't it interesting that when the US thought that it was under attack from the anthrax letters a few years ago and realised that it didn't have enough stockpiled supplies of antidote it desperately sought a generic supply from any where in the world that would supply it!!

S B Norris

Competing interests: None declared

Re: Generic Hypocrisy 27 July 2004
Previous Rapid Response Next Rapid Response Top
Katherine Hovey,
legal
94102

Send response to journal:
Re: Re: Generic Hypocrisy

The current financial reports of the three largest U.S. drug companies overwhelmingly show that the drug companies spend(t) more on advertising than they did on developmnet. I would gather that the real interest in keeping U.S. drug prices high is to pay for their advertising budgets -- right under shareholder profits.

Competing interests: None declared

HIV-It could bite back ! 27 July 2004
Previous Rapid Response  Top
Sanjay D Furtado,
SHO Surgery
Torbay Hospital, Torquay,TQ2 7AA,
Jairaj Furtado

Send response to journal:
Re: HIV-It could bite back !

The issue of rising drug prices and consequently of medical care is of major concern to the electorate of developed nations. Hence, the breast beating goes on at the present time in the US it being an election year.

What the US electorate in general does not know and probably does not concern itself with is the efects US policy would have in people living in other countries.

Though the rights of the pharmaceutical industry should be protected , a mechanism should evolve wherein diseases of transnational importance are dealt with taking into effect the low spending power of developing nations. In this interconnected world, a rising HIV or any other health problem in a developing nation could find its way back to its own home soil. Isn't it time that policy makers within the US understand that the investment in a developing nations HIV problem today could ensure a smaller transmission risk to itself in future.

Competing interests: None declared