Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
David J. Bihari, Associate Professor of Critical Care, University of New South Wales Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia NSW 2031
Send response to journal:
|
I am surprised that the BMJ publishes an editorial entitled "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease"! As a medical student in London in the late 1970s, I was taught that "COPD" was a very poor term used by Americans to describe three seperate diseases - chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma. My pedantic teachers emphasised that whilst there was considerable overlap between these conditions, an effort should be made to distinguish between them. Thus I was taught that a patient might present with the symptoms and signs of "chronic airflow obstruction" or "chronic airflow limitation" and it was the physician's job to make a diagnosis. Obviously, times have changed! Competing interests: None declared |
|||
|
|
|||
|
peter s barling, gp OswestryNot so
Send response to journal:
|
Post Americanisation of diagnosis comes Computerisation of diagnosis in which we fit the patients pathology to what the computer will accept.Thus COPD provides a good box to put the diagnosis into,enabling some rationality of therapy and hopefully benefitingthe patient. Competing interests: None declared |
|||