Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
Steven R. Sproger, Mental Health Consultant, California Department of Health Services 1515 K St.#400,Sacramento, CA 95814,USA
Send response to journal:
|
In looking at the studies of drugs for depression, few determine if the subjects or experimenters are truly blinded. The few studies that assessed "blindness" found that almost half of the Ss were NOT blinded. In addition, oftimes the antidepressants are prescribed for transcient discomforts that, possibly should be endured, such as grief reactions after loss. Further, antidepressants that do control depression only do so as long as they re being used. They do not result in permanent improvement as in the case of psychotherapy. I appreciate the debate in the BMJ. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ned Hoke OMD, L.Ac., Ecological medicine/private practice Calif/USA
Send response to journal:
|
Advertising as public education is a plain fraud. The author's skeptical tones are wholly warranted and seemingly well considered. Already too much "medicine" and medical practice shows too little respect for a thoughtful knowledge transfer enabling the ill to gain benefit through non-drug means. Providing the octane infusion of commercial pharmaceutical advertising to a medically unsophisticated and educationally disenfranchised lay public seems morally unsound and socially irresponsible. Yet seen through the lens of a wishful unfettered capitalist it's an absolutely smashingly good idea. |
|||