Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses: Rapid Responses published:
-
![[Read Rapid Response]](/icons/misc/sectionDOWN.gif)
Local government should be a key stakeholder in disseminating Healthy Japan 21
- Kimiko Ueda, Masako Takano (24 February 2002)
|
|
|||
|
Kimiko Ueda, Assistant Director, Division of Community Health, Shijonawate Public Health Center, Osaka Prefecture 1-16 Esemi-chou Shijonawate Osaka, 575-0034, Japan, Masako Takano
Send response to journal:
|
To the Editor: Dr. Shibuya, et al., found that in Japan the level of individual income is more strongly associated with self-rated health than is income inequality at the prefecture level.1 The authors warned that this evidence does not mean we should not be concerned with reducing income inequality as it effects social conditions. They including in their caveat the effects of local policies that are not easily observed.1 In order to attenuate individual income disparity, we believe that public health in Japan must focus on smaller regions than the prefecture level. Because cities and districts are less homogeneous, income inequality can be detected more easily. Local governments should be key stakeholders in reducing health inequality associated with individual income disparity. In order to bridge health disparities, one indispensable strategy we can employ today is the dissemination of Healthy Japan 21 at the local level. The Ministry of Health and Welfare established a structured national health plan for the first time in 2000 ¨C Healthy Japan 21. This plan focuses on health promotion, developing a supportive environment for individual health, setting national health goals and concrete objectives, and expanding evaluation and collaboration among various stakeholders. Smaller governments, more effective because they are closer to the people, have started to tailor their own health goals after Healthy Japan 21 as a result of the national plan's recommendations for local governments to account for health disparities in their communities. However, the Japan Health Promotion and Fitness Foundation reported in November 2001 that only 140 smaller local governments (cities, towns, villages, and Tokyo wards) have established their own health goals related to Healthy Japan 21. Among Japan's 3246 smaller governmental units, only 1365 plan to establish local goals within three years, while 1741 reported they have no plans to do so. Towns do not perceive a smooth process and do not understand well enough the importance of developing their own goals. We know that local health strategies are more quickly implemented, stronger, more comprehensive, involve people more fully, and more easily build intersectional collaboration than do centralized strategies. Involving people in the process of constructing local health goals for the people rather than for the government is important. Robert Putnam, who examined the performance of local governments in Italy during a 20-year study, found that the stock of social capital in a region, as measured by the density of citizens' participation in community organizations, turned out to be the best predictor of local government performance.2,3 Local governments' establishment of health goals, led by Healthy Japan 21, is the key to better population health in Japan. References 1. Shibuya K, Hashimoto H, Yano E. Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan: cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample. BMJ 2002;324:16-9. 2. Putnam RD. Making democracy work. Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, 1993. 3. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality? BMJ 1997;314:1037-40. Kimiko Ueda, MD, MPH
Masako Takano, MD, PhD
Shijonawate Public Health Center, Osaka Prefectural Government, Japan 1-16 Esemi-chou, Shijonawate, Osaka 575-0034, Japan Correspondece to:
Kimiko Ueda
|
|||