Editor,
Leask et al1 make the very important point that "any attempt at
refuting or deflating the persuasive power of vaccination arguments must
address the potential gut level appeal at which anti-immunisation rhetoric
tends to operate". Consider for example, the question - would you or would
you not seek anti rabies vaccine if a rabid dog bit your child? It would
be interesting to know how many of the anti immunisation camp would
respond in the negative.
There is no doubt that ignoring lessons from health communication
science would jeopardise public health.
1. Leask J-A, Chapman S, Hawe P. Facts are not enough. BMJ 2000;
321:108