Editor,
In the recent editorial on vitamin B-6 Joe Collier discusses the crucial
question of any risk involved in taking it. He concludes that he agrees
with the Committee on Toxicity's decision that there is. Yet in his own
words this is based on a study from over ten years ago, featuring only 172
women. "The results were not consistent with other studies and the trial
design was weak." What is the justification for citing this as conclusive
evidence of risk?
Juliet Cohen General Practitioner
15 Denbigh St, Pimlico, London SW1
Fax 0181 671 7103