Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rapid Responses to:
|
|
Rapid Responses published:
|
|
|||
|
Frank Brennan, General Practitioner Dublin, Ireland
Send response to journal:
|
Dear Editor I read with interest Dr. Cochran's editorial in the BMJ of 23.05.1998. The bulk of infants and toddlers with recurrent cough that I would see in General Practice come from households of smoking parents, but by contrast, I seldom see chesty children from non-smoking households. This makes me conclude that smoke is possibly the most important factor in these children's illness. Many of these children are diagnosed (correctly I believe) with asthma and treated with inhaled steroids or bronchodilators. However, I believe we do many of these children a disservice by labeling them as asthmatics because it implies that they have some intrinsic disease. I think the term 'smoker's cough' though abrupt (and somewhat controversial!) is more appropriate as it powerfully conveys to parents that they are partly responsible for their child's illness. I think it is about time we redressed the balance in favour of prevention in favour of prevention rather than 'cure', Yours faithfully Dr Frank Brennan 48 Summerville Clontarf Dublin 3 Ireland |
|||
|
|
|||
|
David E Bratt, Self employed idem
Send response to journal:
|
Very interesting reading. I would like to ask two questions. What are the references for "the two week trial of oral corticisteroids used in older patients.."? Given the difficulty of obtaining compliance with inhaled corticosteroids in infants, why not a similar oral trial, for the infants of say, five to seven days? DB |
|||