Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:126-129 (19 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39435.656250.AD
Pablo Alonso-Coello, family practitioner1, Alberto López García-Franco, family practitioner2, Gordon Guyatt, professor3, Ray Moynihan, conjoint lecturer4
1 Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de Sant Pau (Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona), 08041, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain, 3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 4 Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
Correspondence to: P Alonso-Coello palonso@santpau.es
After looking at data used to support treatment of women with slightly lowered bone mineral density, Pablo Alonso-Coello and colleagues argue thatproponents have overstated the benefits and underplayed the harms
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Osteoporosis is a controversial condition. An informal global alliance of drug companies, doctors, and sponsored advocacy groups portray and promote osteoporosis as a silent but deadly epidemic bringing misery to tens of millions of postmenopausal women.1 For others, less entwined with the drug industry, that promotion represents a classic case of disease mongering—a risk factor has been transformed into a medical disease in order to sell tests and drugs to relatively healthy women.2 Now the size of the osteoporosis market seems set to greatly expand, as the push begins to treat women with pre-osteoporosis. These are women who are apparently at risk of being at risk, a condition known as osteopenia that is claimed to affect more than half of all white postmenopausal women in the United States.3 We examine the evidence from four post-hoc analyses of trials of osteoporosis drugs that is claimed to support this move.
In 1994
Read all Rapid Responses