BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39559.342859.DB, (Published 21 April 2008)

News

Paediatricians "have grave concerns" about GMC procedures for child protection work

¹ London

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The annual meeting of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health has chosen not to back a strongly worded motion that condemned the UK General Medical Council’s handling of cases of misconduct in child protection work.

But the meeting did pass a motion that voiced milder criticism of the GMC, which many paediatricians accuse of giving too much weight to vexatious and serial complaints against child protection specialists.

The proposed motion would have declared that the college had "no confidence" in GMC procedures, but the motion that was passed refers only to the college’s "grave concerns."

Apart from that change the motion was passed as originally written. Its conclusion reads in part, "The college continues to have grave concerns over the current GMC procedures for dealing with cases related to child protection. We call upon the GMC to review these procedures as a matter of urgency and involve in . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Three doctors and a GMC prosecution

Jonathan Gornall
BMJ 2008 337: a907. [Extract] [Full Text]

GMC strikes Southall off medical register for serious professional misconduct

Owen Dyer
BMJ 2007 335: 1174. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gornall, J. (2008). Three doctors and a GMC prosecution. BMJ 337: a907-a907 [Full text]