BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39471.430451.BE, (Published 7 February 2008)
Research
Effects of acupuncture on rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Eric Manheimer, research associate1,
Grant Zhang, assistant professor1,
Laurence Udoff, assistant professor2,
Aviad Haramati, professor3,
Patricia Langenberg, professor and vice-chair4,
Brian M Berman, professor1,
Lex M Bouter, professor and vice chancellor (rector magnificus)5
1 Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 2200 Kernan Drive, Kernan Hospital Mansion, Baltimore, MD 21207, USA,
2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Services, University of Maryland School of Medicine,
3 Department of Physiology and Biophysics and Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC,
4 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine,
5 VU University Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to: E Manheimer emanheimer{at}compmed.umm.edu
Objective To evaluate whether acupuncture improves rates of
pregnancy and live birth when used as an adjuvant treatment
to embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Database, hand searched abstracts, and reference lists.
Review methods Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that compared needle acupuncture administered within one day of embryo transfer with sham acupuncture or no adjuvant treatment, with reported outcomes of at least one of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, or live birth. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility; assessed methodological quality; and extracted outcome data. For all trials, investigators contributed additional data not included in the original publication (such as live births). Meta-analyses included all randomised patients.
Data synthesis Seven trials with 1366 women undergoing in vitro fertilisation were included in the meta-analyses. There was little clinical heterogeneity. Trials with sham acupuncture and no adjuvant treatment as controls were pooled for the primary analysis. Complementing the embryo transfer process with acupuncture was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in clinical pregnancy (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.14; number needed to treat (NNT) 10 (7 to 17); seven trials), ongoing pregnancy (1.87, 1.40 to 2.49; NNT 9 (6 to 15); five trials), and live birth (1.91, 1.39 to 2.64; NNT 9 (6 to 17); four trials). Because we were unable to obtain outcome data on live births for three of the included trials, the pooled odds ratio for clinical pregnancy more accurately represents the true combined effect from these trials rather than the odds ratio for live birth. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses on study validity variables. A prespecified subgroup analysis restricted to the three trials with the higher rates of clinical pregnancy in the control group, however, suggested a smaller non-significant benefit of acupuncture (odds ratio 1.24, 0.86 to 1.77).
Conclusions Current preliminary evidence suggests that acupuncture given with embryo transfer improves rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Acupuncture with in vitro fertilisation
- Anja Pinborg, Anne Loft, and Anders Nyboe Andersen
BMJ 2008 336: 517-518.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Commentary: Good, but not perfect
- Mike Clarke
BMJ 2008 336: 549.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments
- Ted J Kaptchuk, William B Stason, Roger B Davis, Anna R T Legedza, Rosa N Schnyer, Catherine E Kerr, David A Stone, Bong Hyun Nam, Irving Kirsch, and Rose H Goldman
BMJ 2006 332: 391-397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study
- Lorenzo P Moja, Elena Telaro, Roberto D'Amico, Ivan Moschetti, Laura Coe, Alessandro Liberati on behalf of the Metaquality Study Group
BMJ 2005 330: 1053.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial
- Helen Elden, Lars Ladfors, Monika Fagevik Olsen, Hans-Christian Ostgaard, and Henrik Hagberg
BMJ 2005 330: 761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
- Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks, and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2003 327: 557-560.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence
- Ted J Kaptchuk
BMJ 2003 326: 1453-1455.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Adverse events following acupuncture: prospective survey of 32 000 consultations with doctors and physiotherapists
- Adrian White, Simon Hayhoe, Anna Hart, and Edzard Ernst
BMJ 2001 323: 485-486.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
The York acupuncture safety study: prospective survey of 34 000 treatments by traditional acupuncturists
- Hugh MacPherson, Kate Thomas, Stephen Walters, and Mike Fitter
BMJ 2001 323: 486-487.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
- Peter Jüni, Douglas G Altman, and Matthias Egger
BMJ 2001 323: 42-46.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Beyond conflict of interest
- Richard Smith
BMJ 1998 317: 291-292.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement
- Douglas G Altman
BMJ 1996 313: 570-571.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kiefer, D., Pitluk, J., Klunk, K.
(2009). An Overview of CAM: Components and Clinical Uses. Nutr Clin Pract
24: 549-559
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Sunkara, S. K., Coomarasamy, A., Khalaf, Y., El-Toukhy, T.
(2009). Acupuncture and in vitro fertilization: updated meta-analysis. Hum Reprod
24: 2047-2048
[Full text]
-
Boivin, J., Schmidt, L.
(2009). Use of complementary and alternative medicines associated with a 30% lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate during 12 months of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod
24: 1626-1631
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Ricci, G., Lo Bello, L., Skerk, K.
(2009). RCT of real versus placebo acupuncture in IVF. Hum Reprod
24: 1769-1770
[Full text]
-
So, E.W.S., Ng, E.H.Y., Wong, Y.Y., Yeung, W.S.B., Ho, P.C.
(2009). Reply: RCT of real versus placebo acupuncture in IVF. Hum Reprod
24: 1770-1770
[Full text]
-
Adrian White and Editorial Board of Acupuncture in,
(2009). Western medical acupuncture: a definition. Acupuncture in Medicine
27: 33-35
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
So, E. W. S., Ng, E. H. Y., Wong, Y. Y., Lau, E. Y. L., Yeung, W. S. B., Ho, P. C.
(2009). A randomized double blind comparison of real and placebo acupuncture in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod
24: 341-348
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
(2008). Acupuncture and IVF. JWatch Women's Health
2008: 2-2
[Full text]
-
Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Andersen, A. N.
(2008). Acupuncture with in vitro fertilisation. BMJ
336: 517-518
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- TENS might also improve outcomes
- Andrew J Ashworth
bmj.com, 9 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- An old, but effective skill in use
- Xiaofeng Ren
bmj.com, 11 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- Acupuncture for IVF?
- Edzard Ernst
bmj.com, 12 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- What about "forbidden points"?
- Francesco Crestani, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- Acupuncture helpful in IVF: an absurd claim!
- Cees N.M. Renckens
bmj.com, 18 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Acupuncture helpful in IVF: an absurd claim!
- John P heptonstall
bmj.com, 19 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- Opinions that are pleasing the public with claptrap
- Xiaofeng Ren
bmj.com, 19 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- Anti-anxiety effects of acupuncture in IVF
- Simon Hayhoe, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Mar 2008
[Full text]
- Response from the authors
- Eric Manheimer, et al.
bmj.com, 2 May 2008
[Full text]
- As usual, the middle ground is typically the correct answer
- Michael Poling
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2008
[Full text]