BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25, (Published 12 February 2008)

Research

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients

¹ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B 3DP

Objective To develop and validate practical prognostic models for death at 14 days and for death or severe disability six months after traumatic brain injury.

Design Multivariable logistic regression to select variables that were independently associated with two patient outcomes. Two models designed: "basic" model (demographic and clinical variables only) and "CT" model (basic model plus results of computed tomography). The models were subsequently developed for high and low-middle income countries separately.

Setting Medical Research Council (MRC) CRASH Trial.

Subjects 10 008 patients with traumatic brain injury. Models externally validated in a cohort of 8509.

Results The basic model included four predictors: age, Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity, and the presence of major extracranial injury. The CT model also included the presence of petechial haemorrhages, obliteration of the third ventricle or basal cisterns, subarachnoid bleeding, midline shift, and non-evacuated haematoma. In the derivation sample the models showed excellent discrimination (C statistic above 0.80). The models showed good calibration graphically. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test also indicated good calibration, except for the CT model in low-middle income countries. External validation for unfavourable outcome at six months in high income countries showed that basic and CT models had good discrimination (C statistic 0.77 for both models) but poorer calibration.

Conclusion Simple prognostic models can be used to obtain valid predictions of relevant outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Prognosis and politics

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Prognostic modelling in traumatic brain injury

David Menon and David Harrison
BMJ 2008 336: 397-398. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury

Simon Fleminger and Jennie Ponsford
BMJ 2005 331: 1419-1420. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables

Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2001 323: 224-228. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• De Silva, M. J, Roberts, I., Perel, P., Edwards, P., Kenward, M. G, Fernandes, J., Shakur, H., Patel, V., on behalf of the CRASH Trial Collaborators, (2009). Patient outcome after traumatic brain injury in high-, middle- and low-income countries: analysis of data on 8927 patients in 46 countries. Int J Epidemiol 38: 452-458 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Frost, P., Wise, M. P (2008). Time of hospital presentation may be important. BMJ 336: 522-522 [Full text]  
• Menon, D., Harrison, D. (2008). Prognostic modelling in traumatic brain injury. BMJ 336: 397-398 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Cuba and the management of traumatic brain injury

Florencio Pons, et al.
bmj.com, 19 Feb 2008 [Full text]

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Time of hospital presentation may have independent prognostic value.

Paul Frost, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Feb 2008 [Full text]

Do not forget the pituitary !

Stephanie E Baldeweg
bmj.com, 26 Feb 2008 [Full text]

Niels Bohr wasn't the first

Jørgen Hilden
bmj.com, 1 Mar 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>