BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39338.501447.80, (Published 14 September 2007)

Editorials

The Wanless review

Slow progress on public health may need more health spending

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The review of National Health Service (NHS) funding and performance since 2002 published this week, which has been led by Derek Wanless, has something for everyone.^{1 2} The government's supporters will focus on progress made in appointing extra staff, modernising buildings, buying new equipment, cutting waiting lists and waiting times, and improving priority areas of service provision such as cancer and cardiac care.

The government's critics will emphasise the failure to improve productivity and the high cost of the new contracts for general practitioners, consultants, and other staff. Independent observers will note that progress on reform of the NHS and on the wider public health agenda falls well short of the most optimistic "fully engaged" scenario set out in the original Wanless reports.^{3 4} The implication of this shortfall is that government may need to increase planned spending on the NHS to enable it to meet future demands.

While the review provides . . . [Full text of this article]

Policy and Management, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The Wanless review

Chris Ham
BMJ 2007 335: 572-573. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Optimising Consultant Productivity

Tom J W Lee, et al.
bmj.com, 20 Sep 2007 [Full text]

The same Wanless?

Nadeem E Moghal
bmj.com, 25 Sep 2007 [Full text]

It's more productivity we need not more spending

stephen black
bmj.com, 26 Sep 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>