BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39323.395336.BE, (Published 30 August 2007)

Editorials

Screening for diabetes

Targeted screening causes less stress than mass screening, but there is insufficient evidence to advocate either

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this week's BMJ, two studies by Eborall and colleagues assess the psychological impact of screening for diabetes mellitus in primary care.^{1 2} Screening for diabetes is primarily aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease. The risk of cardiovascular disease increases proportionally as concentrations of glucose increase, with no threshold below which the risk remains constant.³ This is in contrast with other complications of diabetes—such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy—the risk of which sharply increases when glucose concentrations exceed the threshold of 11 mmol/l. At this concentration the typical diagnostic signs of diabetes are usually present—thirst, polyuria, and weight loss.

Population based mass screening for diabetes has been proposed for several years.⁴ This has been fuelled by rising plasma glucose concentrations in most populations worldwide, as a result of increasing body weight associated with a more sedentary lifestyle and changes in diet. Arguments for mass screening include the fact that mildly increased . . . [Full text of this article]

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Focus on diabetes

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

Helen C Eborall, Simon J Griffin, A Toby Prevost, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, David P French, and Stephen Sutton
BMJ 2007 335: 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Patients' experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes: prospective qualitative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

Helen Eborall, Richard Davies, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Simon Griffin, and Julia Lawton
BMJ 2007 335: 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria

Nicholas J Wareham and Simon J Griffin
BMJ 2001 322: 986-988. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hadler, N. M. (2008). Oral Hypoglycemics and Diabetic Nephropathy. CJASN 3: 159-162 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Is anxiety induced by screening for cardiovascular risk factors such a bad thing?

Colin White, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2007 [Full text]

Screening for Diabetes - Much Uncertainty Remains

james m lawrence
bmj.com, 10 Sep 2007 [Full text]

EBM or ethical pragmatism

Rupert Gude
bmj.com, 22 Sep 2007 [Full text]

Importance of (Targeted) Screening for Diabetes

Mayer Davidson
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2007 [Full text]