BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38863.632789.1F, (Published 15 June 2006)

RESEARCH

Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial

Isam Atroshi ^1*, Gert-Uno Larsson ¹, Ewald Ornstein ¹, Manfred Hofer ², Ragnar Johnsson ³, Jonas Ranstam ⁴

¹ Department of Orthopaedics, Hässleholm and Kristianstad Hospitals, SE-281 25 Hässleholm, Sweden
² Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Kristianstad Hospital, SE-291 85 Kristianstad, Sweden
³ Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
⁴ National Swedish Competence Centre for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Lund University Hospital

^* Correspondence to: Isam.Atroshi{at}skane.se.

Objectives To compare endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release surgery among employed patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Design and setting Randomised controlled trial at a single orthopaedic department.

Participants 128 employed patients aged 25-60 years with clinically diagnosed and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Main outcome measures The primary outcome was severity of postoperative pain in the scar or proximal palm and the degree to which pain or tenderness limits activities, each rated on a 4 point scale, transformed into a combined score of 0 (none) to 100 (severe pain or tenderness causing severe activity limitation). The secondary outcomes were length of postoperative work absence, severity of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and functional status scores, SF-12 quality of life score, and hand sensation and strength (blinded examiner); follow-up at three and six weeks and three and 12 months.

Results 63 patients were allocated to endoscopic surgery and 65 patients to open surgery, with no withdrawals or dropouts. Pain in the scar or proximal palm was less prevalent or severe after endoscopic surgery than after open surgery but the differences were generally small. At three months, pain in the scar or palm was reported by 33 patients (52%) in the endoscopic group and 53 patients (82%) in the open group (number needed to treat 3.4, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 7.7) and the mean score difference for severity of pain in scar or palm and limitation of activity was 13.3 (5.3 to 21.3). No differences between the groups were found in the other outcomes. The median length of work absence after surgery was 28 days in both groups. Quality of life measures improved substantially.

Conclusions In carpal tunnel syndrome, endoscopic surgery was associated with less postoperative pain than open surgery, but the small size of the benefit and similarity in other outcomes make its cost effectiveness uncertain.

---

(Accepted 1 April 2006)
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Treating carpal tunnel syndrome endoscopically may not be cost effective
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

A good read

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

Brent Graham
BMJ 2006 332: 1463-1464. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat

Douglas G Altman
BMJ 1998 317: 1309-1312. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• HANSEN, T. B., LARSEN, K. (2009). Age is an important predictor of short-term outcome in endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34: 660-664 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• MALLICK, A., CLARKE, M., WILSON, S., NEWEY, M. L. (2009). Reducing the economic impact of carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34: 679-681 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Keith, M. W., Masear, V., Amadio, P. C., Andary, M., Barth, R. W., Graham, B., Chung, K., Maupin, K., Watters, W. C. III, Haralson, R. H. III, Turkelson, C. M., Wies, J. L., McGowan, R. (2009). Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17: 397-405 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mattioli, S, Baldasseroni, A, Curti, S, Cooke, R M T, Mandes, A, Zanardi, F, Farioli, A, Buiatti, E, Campo, G, Violante, F S (2009). Incidence rates of surgically treated idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome in blue- and white-collar workers and housewives in Tuscany, Italy. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 299-304 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• ATROSHI, I., GUMMESSON, C., MCCABE, S. J., ORNSTEIN, E. (2007). The SF-6D Health Utility Index in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 32: 198-202 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Amadio, P. C. (2007). What's New in Hand Surgery. JBJS 89: 460-465 [Full text]  
• (2006). Endoscopic vs. Open Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. JWatch Neurology 2006: 7-7 [Full text]  
• (2006). CARPHOLOGY by Rajendra. PN 6: 334-334 [Full text]  
• Graham, B. (2006). The diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.. BMJ 332: 1463-1464 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among emplyed patients: randomised controlled trial

Jeremy A Read, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2006 [Full text]

Endoscopic surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Sam Al-Jafari
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2006 [Full text]

Carpal Tunnel Surgery

Adeyinka G. Molajo, et al.
bmj.com, 6 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Which Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

Michael Schenker
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2006 [Full text]

Endoscopic vs Open (I've had both)

Donna Arnold
bmj.com, 4 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>