BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38695.605440.AE, (Published 13 January 2006)

RESEARCH

Predicting prognosis in stable angina--results from the Euro heart survey of stable angina: prospective observational study

Caroline A Daly 1*, Bianca De Stavola 2, Jose L Lopez Sendon 3, Luigi Tavazzi 4, Eric Boersma 5, Felicity Clemens 2, Nicholas Danchin 6, Francois Delahaye 7, Anselm Gitt 8, Desmond Julian 9, David Mulcahy 10, Witold Ruzyllo 11, Kristian Thygesen 12, Freek Verheugt 13, Kim M Fox 1, on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators

1 Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP
2 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London
3 Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
4 Policlinico S Matteo, Pavia, Italy
5 Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
6 Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
7 Hopital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique Louis Pradel, Lyons, France
8 Herzzentrum Luwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
9 University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne
10 Adelaide and Meath incorporating National Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
11 Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
12 Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
13 University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

* Correspondence to: caroline.daly{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Objectives To investigate the prognosis associated with stable angina in a contemporary population as seen in clinical practice, to identify the key prognostic features, and from this to construct a simple score to assist risk prediction.

Design Prospective observational cohort study.

Setting Pan-European survey in 156 outpatient cardiology clinics.

Participants 3031 patients were included on the basis of a new clinical diagnosis by a cardiologist of stable angina with follow-up at one year.

Main outcome measure Death or non-fatal myocardial infarction.

Results The rate of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction in the first year was 2.3 per 100 patient years; the rate was 3.9 per 100 patient years in the subgroup (n=994) with angiographic confirmation of coronary disease. The clinical and investigative factors most predictive of adverse outcome were comorbidity, diabetes, shorter duration of symptoms, increasing severity of symptoms, abnormal ventricular function, resting electrocardiogaphic changes, or not having any stress test done. Results of non-invasive stress tests did not significantly predict outcome in the population who had tests done. A score was constructed using the parameters predictive of outcome to estimate the probability of death or myocardial infarction within one year of presentation with stable angina.

Conclusions A score based on the presence of simple, objective clinical and investigative variables makes it possible to discriminate effectively between very low risk and very high risk patients and to estimate the probability of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction over one year.


(Accepted 8 November 2005)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study
Brian S Buckley, Colin R Simpson, David J McLernon, Andrew W Murphy, and Philip C Hannaford
BMJ 2009 339: b3058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study
Neha Sekhri, Gene S Feder, Cornelia Junghans, Sandra Eldridge, Athavan Umaipalan, Rashmi Madhu, Harry Hemingway, and Adam D Timmis
BMJ 2008 337: a2240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Scoring prognosis in stable angina
BMJ 2006 332: 0. [Full Text]

Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study
Peter Brindle, Jonathan Emberson, Fiona Lampe, Mary Walker, Peter Whincup, Tom Fahey, and Shah Ebrahim
BMJ 2003 327: 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Fox, K., Ford, I., Steg, Ph. G., Tendera, M., Robertson, M., Ferrari, R., on behalf of the BEAUTIFUL Investigators, (2009). Relationship between ivabradine treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with limiting angina: a subgroup analysis of the randomized, controlled BEAUTIFUL trial. Eur Heart J 30: 2337-2345 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Buckley, B. S, Simpson, C. R, McLernon, D. J, Murphy, A. W, Hannaford, P. C (2009). Five year prognosis in patients with angina identified in primary care: incident cohort study. BMJ 339: b3058-b3058 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ferrari, R. (2009). A step further with ivabradine: SIGNIfY (Study assessInG the morbidity-mortality beNefits of the If inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronarY artery disease). Eur Heart J Suppl 11: D19-D27 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fox, K. A A (2009). COURAGE to change practice? Revascularisation in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Heart 95: 689-692 [Full text]  
  • Crea, F., Camici, P. G., De Caterina, R., Lanza, G. A. (2009). CHAPTER 17 Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease. ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2: med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sekhri, N., Feder, G. S, Junghans, C., Eldridge, S., Umaipalan, A., Madhu, R., Hemingway, H., Timmis, A. D (2008). Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study. BMJ 337: a2240-a2240 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Zaman, M. J. MBBS MSc, Junghans, C. PhD, Sekhri, N. MBBS, Chen, R. MD PhD, Feder, G. S. MD, Timmis, A. D. MBBChir MD, Hemingway, H. MBBChir (2008). Presentation of stable angina pectoris among women and South Asian people. CMAJ 179: 659-667 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Clappers, N., Brouwer, M. A., Verheugt, F. W.A. (2008). How to react to high platelet reactivity?. Eur Heart J 29: 1471-1471 [Full text]  
  • Kruk, M., Kadziela, J., Reynolds, H. R., Forman, S. A., Sadowski, Z., Barton, B. A., Mark, D. B., Maggioni, A. P., Leor, J., Webb, J. G., Kapeliovich, M., Marin-Neto, J. A., White, H. D., Lamas, G. A., Hochman, J. S. (2008). Predictors of Outcome and the Lack of Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Across the Risk Strata in Patients With Persistent Total Occlusion After Myocardial Infarction. Results From the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT).. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1: 511-520 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Timmis, A. D, Feder, G., Hemingway, H. (2007). Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution. Heart 93: 786-791 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2007). Stable angina who needs revascularisation?. DTB 45: 12-16 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Krumholz, H. M., Masoudi, F. A. (2006). The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 1886-1895 [Full text]  
  • Jones, M., Rait, G., Falconer, J., Feder, G. (2006). Systematic review: prognosis of angina in primary care. Fam Pract 23: 520-528 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Steg, P. G., Tchetche, D. (2006). Pharmacologic management of stable angina: role of ivabradine. Eur Heart J Suppl 8: D16-D23 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Malik, I. (2006). JournalScan. Heart 92: 575-576 [Full text]  
  • (2006). Risk Scoring for Patients with New Stable Angina. Journal Watch Cardiology 2006: 7-7 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Prognosis estimates need to be for all patients with angina
Melvyn M Jones
bmj.com, 29 Mar 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ