BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38639.702384.AE, (Published 10 November 2005)

PAPERS

Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies to combat malaria in developing countries

Chantal M Morel ^1*, Jeremy A Lauer ², David B Evans ³

¹ Health Policy Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
² Costs, Effectiveness, Expenditure and Priority Setting Team, Health Systems Financing Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
³ Health Systems Financing Department, World Health Organization

^* Correspondence to: Chantal.Morel{at}lshtm.ac.uk.

Objective To determine the cost effectiveness of selected malaria control interventions in the context of reaching the millennium development goals for malaria.

Design Generalised cost effectiveness analysis.

Data sources Efficacy data came from the literature and authors' calculations supported by expert opinion. Quantities for resource inputs came from the literature and from expert opinion; prices came from the WHO-CHOICE database.

Methods Costs were assessed in year 2000 international dollars, and effects were assessed as disability adjusted life years averted by a 10 year implementation programme. Analysis was restricted to sub-Saharan regions where the most deadly form of malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, is most prevalent. The impact on population health for various interventions, and their combinations, was evaluated at selected coverage levels by using a state-transition model. Sensitivity analysis was done for age weights and discounting.

Results High coverage with artemisinin based combination treatments was found to be the most cost effective strategy for control of malaria in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

Conclusions A much larger infusion of resources than those currently available is needed to make headway in the fight to roll back malaria. On cost effectiveness grounds, in most areas in sub-Saharan Africa greater coverage with highly effective combination treatments should be the cornerstone of malaria control. However, treatment alone can achieve less than half the total benefit obtainable through a combination of interventions--scaling up the use of impregnated mosquito nets or indoor spraying with insecticides is also critical. Intermittent presumptive treatment of pregnant women can bring a small but important additional health gain at relatively low cost.

---

(Accepted 12 October 2005)
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Time to reassess strategies for improving health in developing countries

David B Evans, Taghreed Adam, Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer, Stephen S Lim, Andrew Cassels, Timothy G Evans for the the WHO Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (CHOICE) Millennium Development Goals Team
BMJ 2005 331: 1133-1136. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• De Allegri, M., Marschall, P., Flessa, S., Tiendrebeogo, J., Kouyate, B., Jahn, A., Muller, O. (2009). Comparative cost analysis of insecticide-treated net delivery strategies: sales supported by social marketing and free distribution through antenatal care. Health Policy Plan 0: czp031v1-czp031 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rowe, A. K. (2009). Potential of Integrated Continuous Surveys and Quality Management to Support Monitoring, Evaluation, and the Scale-Up of Health Interventions in Developing Countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 971-979 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dodhia, H., Phillips, K. (2008). Measuring burden of disease in two inner London boroughs using Disability Adjusted Life Years. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 313-321 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rowe, A. K., Steketee, R. W. (2007). Predictions of the Impact of Malaria Control Efforts on All-Cause Child Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 48-55 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Woo, P. P.S., Kim, J. J., Leung, G. M. (2007). What Is the Most Cost-Effective Population-Based Cancer Screening Program for Chinese Women?. JCO 25: 617-624 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Evans, D. B, Lim, S. S, Adam, T., Edejer, T. T.-T., WHO Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective, (2005). Evaluation of current strategies and future priorities for improving health in developing countries. BMJ 331: 1457-1461 [Full text]  
• Baltussen, R., Floyd, K., Dye, C. (2005). Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for tuberculosis control in developing countries. BMJ 331: 1364- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Adam, T., Lim, S. S, Mehta, S., Bhutta, Z. A, Fogstad, H., Mathai, M., Zupan, J., Darmstadt, G. L (2005). Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ 331: 1107- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Evans, D. B, Adam, T., Edejer, T. T.-T., Lim, S. S, Cassels, A., Evans, T. G, for the the WHO Choosing Interventions that are Co, (2005). Time to reassess strategies for improving health in developing countries. BMJ 331: 1133-1136 [Full text]  
• Evans, D. B, Edejer, T. T.-T., Adam, T., Lim, S. S, for the WHO Choosing Interventions that are Cost E, (2005). Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries. BMJ 331: 1137-1140 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Corrigendum

Chantal M Morel
bmj.com, 20 Dec 2005 [Full text]

The question is which ACT should we use?

Jacques D Charlwood
bmj.com, 16 Feb 2006 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>