BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38520.451840.E0, (Published 11 August 2005)

PAPERS

Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention

Mark Jones 1, Mark Onslow 2*, Ann Packman 2, Shelley Williams 3, Tika Ormond 4, Ilsa Schwarz 5, Val Gebski 6

1 Queensland Clinical Trials Centre, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woollongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
2 Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia
3 Stuttering Treatment and Research Trust, Parnell, Auckland 1001, New Zealand
4 Department of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
5 Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
6 National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia

* Correspondence to: m.onslow{at}fhs.usyd.edu.au.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention by comparison to a control group.

Design A pragmatic, open plan, parallel group, randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Setting Two public speech clinics in New Zealand.

Participants Stuttering preschool children who presented to the speech clinics for treatment. Inclusion criteria were age 3-6 years and frequency of stuttering of at least 2% syllables stuttered. Exclusion criteria were onset of stuttering during the six months before recruitment and treatment for stuttering during the previous 12 months. 54 participants were randomised: 29 to the Lidcombe programme arm and 25 to the control arm. 12 of the participants were girls.

Intervention Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention.

Main outcome measures Frequency of stuttering was measured as the proportion of syllables stuttered, from audiotaped recordings of participants' conversational speech outside the clinic. Parents in both arms of the trial collected speech samples in three different speaking situations before randomisation and at three, six, and nine months after randomisation.

Results Analysis showed a highly significant difference (P=0.003) at nine months after randomisation. The mean proportion of syllables stuttered at nine months after randomisation was 1.5% (SD 1.4) for the treatment arm and 3.9% (SD 3.5) for the control arm, giving an effect size of 2.3% of syllables stuttered (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 3.9). This effect size was more than double the minimum clinically worthwhile difference specified in the trial protocol.

Conclusions The results provide evidence from a randomised controlled trial to support early intervention for stuttering. The Lidcombe programme is an efficacious treatment for stuttering in children of preschool age.


(Accepted 8 June 2005)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Giving steroids before elective caesarean section: Authors respond to editorial
P R Stutchfield and R Whitaker
BMJ 2005 331: 1475. [Extract] [Full Text]

Stuttering can be treated by early intervention
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Packman, A, Onslow, M, Reilly, S, Attanasio, J, Shenker, R (2009). Stuttering and bilingualism. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 248-248 [Full text]  
  • Miller, B., Guitar, B. (2009). Long-Term Outcome of the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering Intervention. AJSLP 18: 42-49 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Reilly, S., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Wake, M., Bavin, E. L., Prior, M., Eadie, P., Cini, E., Bolzonello, C., Ukoumunne, O. C. (2009). Predicting Stuttering Onset by the Age of 3 Years: A Prospective, Community Cohort Study. Pediatrics 123: 270-277 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Onslow, M., Jones, M., O'Brian, S., Menzies, R., Packman, A. (2008). Defining, Identifying, and Evaluating Clinical Trials of Stuttering Treatments: A Tutorial for Clinicians. AJSLP 17: 401-415 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lewis, C., Packman, A., Onslow, M., Simpson, J. M., Jones, M. (2008). A Phase II Trial of Telehealth Delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. AJSLP 17: 139-149 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Millichap, J. G. (2008). Etiology and Treatment of Developmental Stuttering. AAP Grand Rounds 19: 42-42 [Full text]  
  • Ward, D. (2008). The aetiology and treatment of developmental stammering in childhood. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: 68-71 [Full text]  
  • Ingham, R. J. (2007). Yaruss, Coleman, and Hammer (2006): An Exemplar of Non-Evidence-Based Practice in Stuttering Treatment. LSHSS 38: 283-286 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Onslow, M., Yaruss, J. S. (2007). Differing Perspectives on What to Do With a Stuttering Preschooler and Why. AJSLP 16: 65-68 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bothe, A. K., Davidow, J. H., Bramlett, R. E., Ingham, R. J. (2006). Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: I. Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioral, cognitive, and related approaches.. AJSLP 15: 321-341 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ratner, N. B. (2006). Evidence-Based Practice: An Examination of Its Ramifications for the Practice of Speech-Language Pathology. LSHSS 37: 257-267 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Yaruss, J. S., Coleman, C., Hammer, D. (2006). Treating preschool children who stutter: description and preliminary evaluation of a family-focused treatment approach.. LSHSS 37: 118-136 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schonwald, A. (2006). Intervention to Treat Stuttering Preschoolers. AAP Grand Rounds 15: 17-18 [Full text]  
  • (2006). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 94-94 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Therapy for young children who stutter: Efficacy is in the eye of the beholder
Joseph Kalinowski, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Aug 2005 [Full text]
The statistical fluctuation in the natural recovery rate between control and treatment group dilutes their results
Tom Weidig
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Re: The statistical fluctuation in the natural recovery rate between control and treatment group dilutes their results
Tom Weidig
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Stuttering children in the developing world
Bolajoko. O Olusanya, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Reply to the rapid responses
Mark A Jones, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Re: Reply to the rapid responses
Tom Weidig
bmj.com, 9 Jan 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ