Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 5 November 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4308
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4308
Abhijoy Chakladar, research fellow, Hazel Adams, consultant
1 Department of Anaesthesia, Princess Royal Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 4EX
Correspondence to: A Chakladar abhijoy.chakladar@gmail.com
An over the counter fetal heart monitor can be a fun purchase for expectant parents eager to hear their unborn child. But Abhijoy Chakladar and Hazel Adams warn that parents shouldnt rely on the devices to indicate fetal health
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The fetal heart rate is commonly measured on the labour ward and during pregnancy to monitor the health of the fetus. It requires training and skill to perform accurately. Over the past few years fetal heart monitors have been marketed to expectant parents who want to hear their babys heartbeat. However, if not used properly these devices can provide false reassurance, as our recent case describes.
A 34 year old woman presented urgently to our labour ward on a Monday unable to detect her babys heartbeat with her fetal heart monitor. She was 38 weeks pregnant with her first baby and was fit and well, with no medical history. Screening blood tests, fetal anomaly, and subsequent growth scans had shown no abnormalities. The preceding Friday she had noticed a reduction in fetal movements but had reassured herself by listening to the "fetal" heartbeat over the weekend. An urgent ultrasound scan
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses