Published 2 November 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4527
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4527

Letters

Seeding trials

Just say no

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The postmarketing observational studies referred to by Annette Tufts in her news story are sham studies that are generally referred to as "seeding trials."1 2 The actual research taking place is the evaluation of the return on investment (ROI) from paying physician "investigators" to participate in the sham study. The ROI is measured by tracking the increased use of the drug by participating doctors, who are the real subjects of these studies.3

No patient would ever agree to participate in a trial designed to determine how the use of physicians as investigators can increase drug sales. No institutional review board would ever approve such a trial. Unfortunately, the side effects from these sham trials are real.4

Drug companies are systematically misleading patients and doctors in these seeding trials. The Nuremberg Code (and all other medical research codes) requires that research subjects should be informed of the purpose of the research. This . . . [Full text of this article]

David Egilman, clinical associate professor

1 Brown University, Department of Community Health, 8 North Main Street, Attleboro, MA 02703, USA

david@neveragainconsulting.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Leading German doctors criticise rising use of post-marketing observational studies by drug companies
Annette Tuffs
BMJ 2009 339: b4199. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ