Editorials

What does the future hold for the NHS at 60?

Flux and conflict constrained by consensus as in the past

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

When the NHS celebrated its 50th anniversary with much pomp, commemorative stamps, and a service in Westminster Abbey, a new Labour government was busy reversing many of the policies of its Conservative predecessor. The internal market was abolished, as was general practitioner fundholding. The NHS would indeed be modernised, but it would be on the basis of cooperation not competition.

Who then—in the euphoria of the celebrations when Frank Dobson, the secretary of state for health, could claim that "the NHS remains the envy of the world"1—would have anticipated that within a couple of years policy would go into reverse gear? Who then would have predicted the emergence of a new model for the NHS based on choice, competition, payment by results, and a plurality of providers, let alone the emergence of institutions like foundation trusts? To ask these questions is to underline the perils of prediction. It is . . . [Full text of this article]

Rudolf Klein, visiting professor

1 London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE

rudolfklein30@aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Should patients be able to pay top-up fees to receive the treatment they want? Yes
James Gubb
BMJ 2008 336: 1104. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Yet more flux and conflict
Philip J R Taylor, et al.
bmj.com, 4 Jul 2008 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ