BMJ  2008;336:1506 (28 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39617.634190.59

Views & Reviews

Why should doctors be interested in climate change?

¹ Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Smoking and Health was published in 1962,¹ but 45 years passed before smoking was banned in enclosed public places in England. We have a small fraction of that time to cap carbon emissions globally to avoid serious risk of irreversible climate change.² Smoking cessation has long been a recognised, legitimate, clinical aim—yet personal carbon footprint reduction is not. Why not?

Health professionals were powerful catalysts to society changing its view about smoking. Smoking is no longer seen as a normal lifestyle choice, but an addiction that has harmful effects not just for the individual but for others. Most of us do not yet think of our high carbon lifestyle as an addiction that is more destructive than tobacco, and irreversibly so.

We have not yet developed the professional attitudes, language, or conceptual framework needed to make it easy and legitimate to tackle this addiction in the clinical setting. Just as . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Climate change: our new responsibility

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fielding, R. (2008). Do we face a third revolution in human history? If so, how will public health respond?. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 366-367 [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more >>